TMX’s C$3B/12 months Oil & Fuel Subsidy Lesson: Design Vitality Hall For Electrons Not Oil

Join CleanTechnica’s Weekly Substack for Zach and Scott’s in-depth analyses and excessive degree summaries, join our each day e-newsletter, and/or observe us on Google Information!

Canada is as soon as once more flirting with the concept of an east-west power hall. The imaginative and prescient sounds huge and daring: a chosen path throughout the nation to hold every thing from crude oil to pure gasoline, hydrogen to electrical energy. On this fast, Trump-inflected election cycle, political leaders are lining up behind the concept, polling suggests the general public is receptive, and infrastructure gamers are circling the idea prefer it’s a long-lost gold vein. The inclusion of hydrogen ought to inform you one thing.

However earlier than the nation begins clearing right-of-ways and pouring concrete, it’s value asking what occurred the final time Canada launched into a nation-building power infrastructure mission with this a lot ambition. The cautionary story isn’t buried in historical past—it’s contemporary, absolutely constructed, and already bleeding crimson ink. It’s the Trans Mountain Enlargement.

TMX was presupposed to be easy. Add a twinned pipeline beside an current one. Transfer extra oil to the West Coast. Entry worldwide markets. The non-public sector, particularly Kinder Morgan, initially carried the torch. Then the delays began. Authorized challenges. Allowing battles. Public resistance. Indigenous session gaps. By 2018, the federal authorities stepped in to purchase your complete mission—pipe, plans, liabilities, and all—for C$4.5 billion, with an enlargement nonetheless to construct. That enlargement, pegged at round C$7 billion on the time, in the end price C$34 billion. The road got here on-line in 2024. Crude is flowing. However so are the questions.

The financial case for TMX was all the time extra political than monetary. It was framed as a obligatory path to market diversification. And in that slender sense, it has delivered: for the primary time, a considerable quantity of Canadian oil is being loaded onto tankers certain for South Korea, California, and infrequently India or China. The oil sands have their tidewater outlet. However what did it price? The tolls that shippers pay are set by long-term contracts signed years in the past.

For many of the line’s capability, dedicated tolls are round C$11.46 per barrel. In keeping with economists who’ve run the mathematics, the break-even toll to get better the complete capital price of the enlargement is someplace between C$22 and C$25. That leaves a niche of over C$10 per barrel. Multiply that by the volumes transferring by means of TMX—round 700,000 barrels per day at 80% utilization—and the general public is implicitly subsidizing the mission to the tune of practically C$3 billion per yr. At full capability, the subsidy would exceed C$3.6 billion yearly. I’m on report as believing it is going to by no means refill, will see declining volumes in a decade and be bankrupt in 2040 as oil demand drops and Alberta’s heavy, bitter, low-quality product is first off the market, so we’ll by no means seemingly get to the C$3.6 billion, however C$3 isn’t precisely change you discover in your automobile seats.

That’s not a rounding error. It’s not simply the same old slippage that comes with megaprojects. It’s a systemic underpricing of fossil infrastructure, backed by taxpayer {dollars}. It’s precisely the form of factor the nation must reckon with earlier than charging forward with one other grand hall scheme. No matter type this power hall takes—whether or not it carries bitumen, gasoline, electrons, or some mixture—the identical dangers loom. Value overruns. Weak industrial ensures. Political interference. Underpriced entry. And in the end, the quiet assumption that when the economics don’t pencil out, the general public will make up the distinction.

TMX reveals what occurs when governments tackle threat that the market received’t. It demonstrates how strategic infrastructure can mutate into fiscal liabilities when price controls are tender and pricing self-discipline evaporates. It additionally reveals how troublesome it’s to cost market charges as soon as long-term contracts are signed at political moments of urgency. Shippers don’t renegotiate. Regulators get boxed in. Taxpayers are left holding the bag. For all of the political speak of market entry and worldwide leverage, what TMX grew to become was a really costly method to transfer Canadian bitumen to international markets at a value that’s not remotely financial for the general public that constructed it.

The gamers who construct and function pipelines in Canada are dwindling. Kinder Morgan offered their to-be-stranded TMX asset to Canada, who created a Crown company to carry it. TC Vitality is out of the pipeline enterprise, having divested its belongings. That leaves Enbridge, who hasn’t precisely been presenting absolutely costed pitches for an power hall that can seemingly price C$20 billion plus when all of the mud settles. In spite of everything, as badly because the TMX tripling was managed and as difficult as going by means of the Rockies is, the power hall could be 4 occasions longer.

And but, there’s a case—if a reluctant one—to be made for a hall. If a pipeline needs to be constructed, for political causes or as a part of a transitional cut price, then let it include one thing extra helpful. Let it carry the electrons that can outline Canada’s future. If a nationwide hall goes to be pushed by means of, it must be designed as a multi-use spine—with HVDC transmission strains because the central backbone and molecule infrastructure as a brief passenger. The hall ought to join Alberta wind, BC hydro, prairie photo voltaic, and Quebec hydroelectricity. It ought to facilitate two-way clear power commerce between provinces and allow deep electrification throughout sectors. If oil and gasoline pipelines are the excuse, superb—however the HVDC have to be the legacy.

Canada wants a continental-scale transmission spine. It wants a method to transfer renewable power from surplus to deficit, to combine provincial grids, to deal with seasonal peaks and long-duration storage. The form of system that doesn’t simply meet at this time’s wants however creates tomorrow’s capability. That’s the infrastructure value underwriting. If the political capital to construct a hall exists, it have to be spent on electrons first. Molecules can hitch a journey—however they shouldn’t outline the route or the return.

TMX additionally teaches a subtler lesson about fiscal design. If a future pipeline or hall is to be publicly facilitated, the toll construction have to be strong, clear, and tethered to price restoration. Dedicated shippers should pay charges that replicate full lifecycle prices. There can’t be one other spherical of underpriced entry justified by short-term market politics. As a result of as soon as the toll is ready, it’s set. If it’s mistaken, the injury compounds for many years. Infrastructure finance is brutal that manner: the mathematics is detached to rhetoric. Subsidizing fossil fuels out of the general public purse has to cease.

There’s additionally the matter of stranded threat. TMX might find yourself being the final main oil pipeline inbuilt Canada. It arrived simply as peak international oil demand began to really feel actual, simply as capital markets started pivoting, and simply as worldwide local weather commitments began biting. The identical pressures that made TMX a tough promote will make the subsequent pipeline even more durable. If Canada commits to constructing a hall within the 2020s and it seems the 2030s convey declining oil volumes, then the general public may as soon as once more be left with a stranded asset—or worse, a stranded hall.

So what does a sensible hall seem like? It begins with self-discipline: clear standards for public funding, enforced toll restoration fashions, Indigenous possession from day one, and a modular buildout that prioritizes electrical energy transmission. It have to be resilient, not simply bodily however economically. It should accommodate future decarbonization trajectories, not struggle them. And it have to be designed to ship long-term public worth, not simply short-term political credit score.

If TMX is the value of studying that lesson, then at the very least the tutoring was paid. What Canada can’t afford is to deal with it as a blueprint. The subsequent hall should carry greater than oil. It should carry the grid. If we get that half proper, we would simply flip one of many costliest pipeline errors in historical past into the spark that powers a wiser, cleaner future.