14 C
New York
Monday, March 17, 2025
Home Blog Page 3784

macos – The right way to convert Mac System Info report in .spx to .csv?

codesanitize
-
0
macos – The right way to convert Mac System Info report in .spx to .csv?


With sufficient scripting, you could possibly absolutely extract the info from the XML dump, however System Profiler has a command line flag that makes it output JSON, which is rather more handy to work with:

system_profiler -json -nospawn SPApplicationsDataType -detailLevel full

And it is a bit hacky, however Apple’s “Open Scripting Structure” command line device osascript helps JavaScript, so it may be abused to parse and manipulate JSON with out putting in any third-party instruments. This is the JavaScript that converts the JSON dump to CSV:

let apps = /* [system_profiler output] */.SPApplicationsDataType;
// Gather all keys current in any row
let keys = apps.scale back((keys, app) =>
{
    for(let ok of Object.keys(app))
        if(keys.indexOf(ok) == -1)
            keys.push(ok);
    return keys;
}, []);
// Extract values and change lacking values with empty string
let csv = apps.map(app => keys.map(ok => app[k] || ''));
// Add keys as column headers
csv.unshift(keys);
// Yield the output (implicitly printed in osascript)
csv.map(row => row.map(discipline =>
{
    // Flip all entries into strings
    let s = discipline + '';
    // Escape traces with commas, quotes and newlines
    return s.match(/[,"n]/) ? '"' + s.change('"', '""') + '"' : s;
}).be part of(',')).be part of('n')

Now we simply change /* [system_profiler output] */ with $(cat /dev/stdin), put backslashes in entrance of double quotes and different backslashes, cram all of it right into a shell string, chain the 2 instructions collectively and we’ve a one-liner that outputs CSV:

system_profiler -json -nospawn SPApplicationsDataType -detailLevel full | osascript -l JavaScript <<<"let apps = $(cat /dev/stdin).SPApplicationsDataType; let keys = apps.scale back((keys, app) => { for(let ok of Object.keys(app)) if(keys.indexOf(ok) == -1) keys.push(ok); return keys; }, []); let csv = apps.map(app => keys.map(ok => app[k] || '')); csv.unshift(keys); csv.map(row => row.map(discipline => { let s = discipline + ''; return s.match(/[,"n]/) ? '"' + s.change('"', '""') + '"' : s; }).be part of(',')).be part of('n')"

Could be piped to a file by appending one thing like >~/Desktop/dump.csv.

Sophos Endpoint – Sophos Information

codesanitize
-
0
Sophos Endpoint – Sophos Information


Following on from our latest article on the kernel drivers in Sophos Intercept X, by which we mentioned how they’re examined and what they do, we’re offering additional transparency into the internal workings of Intercept X – this time with a take a look at content material updates which might be both configuration adjustments that lead to adjustments to code execution paths, or are code themselves.

Intercept X makes use of a mixture of real-time Cloud lookups and on-device content material updates. As a result of the risk panorama is continually evolving and shifting, it’s essential that on-device content material updates are delivered often (some on-device knowledge adjustments much less often, however might require updates at brief discover). Nevertheless, this comes with its personal dangers; if content material updates are corrupt or invalid, this may end up in disruption.

Sophos makes use of a typical mechanism to distribute on-device content material updates, that are loaded into low-privileged Sophos user-space processes (reasonably than being loaded into or interpreted by Sophos kernel drivers) from Sophos’s Content material Distribution Community (CDN). Content material updates type one of many three foremost parts of Intercept X, together with software program from the CDN, and coverage and configuration from Sophos Central.

On this article, we’ll discover the varied varieties of content material updates we use, how we confirm and validate them, and the way the ecosystem is architected to keep away from points brought on by corrupt or faulty content material. (As we famous in our earlier article, Intercept X (and all its parts) has additionally been a part of an exterior bug bounty program since December 14, 2017.)

It’s value noting that the small print inside this text are appropriate as of this writing (August 2024) however might change sooner or later as we proceed to replace and develop options.

Sophos delivers new content material updates to prospects in ‘launch teams.’ Every Sophos Central tenant is assigned to a launch group.

The primary launch group is for inside engineering testing; we don’t assign any manufacturing prospects to it. This enables our engineering groups to check new content material updates on manufacturing infrastructure, with out requiring any guide steps. If testing fails, we abort the discharge with out continuing to any additional launch teams.

If engineering qualification succeeds, we manually promote the discharge to the ‘Sophos inside’ launch group (‘dogfooding’). This contains Sophos staff’ manufacturing units, in addition to staff’ private accounts. Once more, if issues are detected or reported, we abort the discharge and don’t proceed any additional.

All being nicely, we then manually promote the discharge to public launch teams. From this level, the Sophos launch programs mechanically publish the brand new content material replace to all the discharge teams over a interval of a number of hours or days by default (see Determine 1 beneath).

A blue timeline graphic depicting how content updates are released in phases

Determine 1: Phases of launch, with verification checks at every section

Sophos AutoUpdate – a part of Intercept X – checks for brand spanking new content material updates each hour, though in follow updates are much less frequent than this (see desk beneath).

Sophos AutoUpdate downloads every content material replace from the CDN and checks to see if new content material replace packages can be found for the suitable launch group.

Content material updates are time-stamped and signed utilizing SHA-384 and a non-public Sophos certificates chain. Sophos AutoUpdate verifies the updates it downloads. If it detects corrupt or untrusted updates, it discards them and warns each Sophos and the Sophos Central administrator. As well as, to guard in opposition to stale CDN caches or malicious replay assaults, Sophos AutoUpdate rejects any otherwise-valid replace whose signature timestamp is older than the already-downloaded replace.

If a brand new content material replace bundle is out there, Sophos AutoUpdate downloads and installs it utilizing the related bundle installer. Completely different updates are dealt with by completely different parts of Intercept X.

The next content material updates are a part of the most recent Intercept X launch (2042.2).

Desk 1: An outline of the content material updates which might be a part of the most recent Intercept X launch (2024.2)

A graphic showing which content updates relate to which processes and kernel drivers

Determine 2: A diagram illustrating which Sophos processes (proven in navy blue) load which content material updates (proven in purple)

DatasetA

DatasetA is loaded by SophosFileScanner.exe, a low-privilege course of with no filesystem entry (apart from its log folder and a brief listing used for scanning massive objects). It masses the Sophos Anti-Virus Interface (SAVI).

SophosFileScanner.exe scans content material following scan requests from different Sophos processes. Though it’s referred to as “SophosFileScanner.exe”, the title is considerably historic: it’s the main content material scanner in Intercept X, scanning recordsdata, course of reminiscence, community site visitors, and so forth.

LocalRepData

LocalRepData incorporates two fame lists:

  1. Repute by SHA-256
  2. Repute by signer

When a Home windows executable begins execution, Intercept X appears to be like it up within the LocalRepData by its SHA-256 hash and its signature (assuming it’s validly signed). If the fame is supplied by LocalRepData, Intercept X ‘tags’ the method with the fame (Sophos guidelines deal with high-reputation recordsdata and processes in another way – as an illustration, exempting them from cleanup).

SSPService.exe makes use of LocalRepData to assign fame as processes launch.

SophosFileScanner.exe additionally masses LocalRepData, in order that it will probably assign fame to embedded executable streams it discovers in content material apart from executed recordsdata.

Conduct

Conduct guidelines are loaded by SSPService.exe. Guidelines recordsdata include signed and encrypted Lua code. SSPService.exe verifies, decrypts and masses the foundations right into a sandboxed LuaJIT interpreter with entry solely to Sophos-internal APIs.

Lua is a quick, embedded scripting language. Sophos makes use of Lua for habits guidelines as a result of it supplies a versatile solution to ship new habits detections with no need a brand new software program launch, however whereas nonetheless sustaining security. The foundations are loaded in user-space, so can’t trigger a important system failure in the event that they misbehave. As well as, Sophos builds its guidelines engine with out the Lua base libraries – the one entry to the system is by way of Sophos’ inside API, which is hardened in opposition to unintended misuse by the habits guidelines. Sophos collects in depth telemetry about rule runtimes, and repeatedly tunes and reduces runtime overhead.

Guidelines are reactors: Intercept X supplies numerous occasions, and guidelines register handlers for these occasions. Guidelines may configure numerous aggregation parameters for some high-volume occasions, permitting the sensor to coalesce or discard sure occasions.

Flags

Flags are the means by which Sophos steadily allows new options in Intercept X. Flags are delivered in two methods:

  1. The Flags Complement incorporates a baseline set of flags akin to the out there options within the software program
  2. The Flags Service is a Sophos Central microservice that enables Sophos Launch Engineers to configure flags throughout a number of tenants

The Flags Complement for a given software program launch incorporates a set of function flags and the way the function ought to be enabled:

Flag Complement Worth Flag Service Worth Characteristic is…
Off Ignored Off
Accessible Off Off
Accessible On On

This mechanism offers Sophos a number of avenues to allow and disable options.

  • Sophos can introduce new options with the flag “Accessible” (however not enabled within the Flags Service)
  • Sophos can steadily allow new options utilizing the Flags Service to allow flags throughout tenants
  • Sophos can disable a problematic function by disabling the flag within the Flags Service
  • Sophos can disable a problematic function in a particular software program launch by altering the discharge’s Flags Complement.

CRT

The Competitor Elimination Instrument (CRT) incorporates a algorithm for eradicating known-incompatible software program throughout the set up. It’s mechanically downloaded by the installer, and is eliminated after set up.

Usually the CRT just isn’t utilized by Intercept X; nevertheless, if a buyer installs a non-protection element like Sophos Gadget Encryption, and later opts to deploy Intercept X, the present agent downloads and installs the CRT and runs it previous to set up. As soon as Intercept X is put in, the CRT is mechanically eliminated.

Endpoint Self Assist Ruleset

The Endpoint Self Assist (ESH) guidelines are a set of standard expressions for sure log recordsdata. If Sophos engineers have recognized a typical root trigger or misconfiguration, they’ll publish a brand new rule and hyperlink again to the Information Base Article (KBA) describing the issue and the prompt resolution(s).

ScheduledQueryPack

The scheduled question pack content material replace incorporates an inventory of scheduled queries and their execution frequency. The foundations are loaded by SophosOsquery.exe; the output is delivered by McsClient.exe for ingestion by the Sophos Central Knowledge Lake.

SophosOsquery.exe has a built-in watchdog that forestalls ‘runaway’ queries from consuming extreme CPU or reminiscence. Sophos collects telemetry on scheduled question efficiency, and frequently optimizes and tunes scheduled queries to keep away from triggering the watchdog.

RemapperRules

The remapper guidelines are loaded by McsAgent.exe and used to ‘remap’ Sophos Central coverage settings into the Endpoint configuration, saved within the Home windows registry underneath HKLMSOFTWARESophosManagementPolicy.

The coverage is equipped from Central as a set of XML paperwork. The foundations are additionally a set of XML paperwork that describe the construction of the information saved within the registry and supply XPath queries and some conversion capabilities to extract content material from the coverage XML and generate registry knowledge.

If a rule file is corrupt, or if processing them fails for another cause, not one of the registry values outlined by that file are up to date and any earlier settings are left intact. Processing of different, legitimate, rule recordsdata is equally unaffected.

EPIPS_data

The EPIPS_data content material replace incorporates intrusion prevention system (IPS) signatures loaded by SophosIPS.exe. SophosIPS.exe incorporates a Sophos-built IPS product; the signatures are IPS signatures printed by SophosLabs.

SophosIPS.exe runs as a low-privilege course of. When IPS is enabled, the sntp.sys driver sends packets to SophosIPS.exe for filtering; SophosIPS.exe responds to the driving force with instructions to just accept or reject the packets.

Interacting with community flows packet-by-packet deep within the community stack requires excessive care. The Home windows Filtering Platform (WFP) callouts at L2 are very delicate to the underlying drivers, typically from third-parties, that service the bodily and media entry layers. Due to the excessive threat to system stability, the IPS function displays itself for BSODs or community disruptions which might be possible brought on by third-party driver interactions. If detected, the IPS function mechanically disables itself and units the endpoint’s well being standing to purple as an alert to the incompatibility.

NTP_OVERRIDES

One of many potential points when constructing a Home windows Filtering Platform (WFP) kernel driver is that though the platform is designed for a number of drivers to work together with the filtering stack on the similar time, Sophos has recognized sure third-party software program packages that aren’t appropriate with the IPS function, which requires the power to intercept and manipulate L2 packets.

The NTP_OVERRIDES content material replace incorporates an inventory of known-incompatible drivers. If IPS is enabled in coverage however deployed on a tool with an incompatible driver, SophosNtpService.exe disables IPS, overriding the coverage.

That is delivered as a content material replace in order that as new incompatible drivers are found, Sophos can react dynamically to guard different prospects with the identical configuration. As well as, if Sophos or third-parties replace drivers to handle the incompatibility, Sophos can take away the driving force as of a sure model.

RepairKit

Throughout every hourly replace, Sophos AutoUpdate executes a self-repair program (su-repair.exe) to detect and proper any repairable recognized points. The RepairKit was initially constructed to detect and restore file corruption brought on by unclean shutdowns that would corrupt the Sophos set up. Over time, the Sophos engineering staff has used this facility to appropriate many points that traditionally would have required a Sophos assist engagement with the shopper, or probably gone unnoticed till a future software program replace flagged the problem.

RepairKit guidelines are written in Lua and loaded by su-repair.exe. The foundations are encrypted and signed. If su-repair.exe fails to load the RepairKit guidelines, it masses a baked-in ‘final resort’ ruleset which solely focuses on repairing Sophos AutoUpdate itself.

RepairKit guidelines have broad entry to the machine and run as SYSTEM, since they want the power to appropriate privileged keys and recordsdata.

TELEMSUP

This telemetry content material replace incorporates a JSON doc describing how typically and the place to submit telemetry:

{
"additionalHeaders": "x-amz-acl:bucket-owner-full-control",
"port": 0,
"resourceRoot": "prod",
"server": "t1.sophosupd.com",
"verb": "PUT",
"interval": 86400
}

The telemetry content material replace has not modified because it was launched in 2016.

APPFEED, USERAPPFEED

The APPFEED content material updates include signed and encrypted Lua snippets for detecting put in functions and dynamically producing exclusions for them.

If an software is detected for which the APPFEED incorporates exclusion guidelines, the foundations dynamically generate machine-specific exclusions based mostly on the put in software. These exclusions are reported again to Sophos Central for informational show to the Sophos Central administrator.

The foundations have read-only entry to the registry and filesystem, and customarily function by searching for recognized apps within the Add/Take away Packages registry keys. Some functions, like Microsoft SQL Server, require executing PowerShell script to detect non-obligatory OS parts.

APPFEED and USERAPPFEED are loaded by an occasion of SEDService.exe.

ProductRulesFeed

Product guidelines are loaded by SSPService.exe. They’re in the identical format as Conduct guidelines, with the identical entry and privileges. They’re loaded into the identical LuaJIT interpreter and supply core performance required by the Conduct guidelines.

ML fashions

The ML fashions content material replace incorporates a number of machine studying fashions loaded by SophosFileScanner.exe. In contrast to most content material updates, ML fashions include Home windows DLLs that include the core ML mannequin logic, in addition to the ‘weights’ – the results of coaching and tuning fashions within the SophosLabs Cloud.

The ML fashions are loaded by SophosFileScanner.exe and are run in the identical low-privilege setting. SophosFileScanner.exe helps loading two variations of every mannequin: ‘telemetry’ and ‘dwell.’ Sophos makes use of this functionality to ship candidate ML fashions in telemetry mode. When SophosFileScanner.exe has an ML mannequin in telemetry mode, it selects a pattern of knowledge for telemetry evaluation, and runs it by the telemetry mannequin (along with regular actions). The output from the telemetry mannequin, alongside the information collected by the traditional fashions, supplies telemetry to Sophos for evaluation and coaching.

Sophos delivers ML fashions as content material updates so {that a} new ML mannequin can get a number of iterations of telemetry, retraining, and fine-tuning earlier than being promoted to the dwell mannequin.

For the reason that ML mannequin replace incorporates executable code, Sophos releases it extra steadily and with extra gates:

  • It spends extra time within the early launch teams (engineering testing and Sophos Inner)
  • It’s launched over a number of weeks, not hours.

Hmpa_data

The Hmpa_data content material replace incorporates a worldwide allowlist of HitmanPro.Alert thumbprints. Each HitmanPro.Alert detection creates a novel thumbprint for the related mitigation and the detection-specific data. For instance, a thumbprint for a StackPivot mitigation would possibly embody the method and the previous few stack frames.

Hmpa_data incorporates a compact record of worldwide allowed thumbprints. The HitmanPro.Alert service hmpalertsvc.exe makes use of this database to rapidly and quietly suppress detections, scale back false positives, and keep away from efficiency or stability points.

  • The HitmanPro.Alert driver, hmpalert.sys, generates thumbprints and sends them to the service for any driver-based mitigation: CryptoGuard, CiGuard, PrivGuard, and so on.
  • The HitmanPro.Alert hook DLL, hmpalert.dll, which is injected into person processes, generates thumbprints for every detection and sends them to the service for reporting.

With the intention to maintain tempo with the ever-evolving risk panorama, and to guard in opposition to rising threats, it’s vitally essential to frequently replace safety merchandise with new knowledge. Nevertheless, corrupt or faulty content material updates could cause disruptions, so it’s additionally important that there are mechanisms in place to assist be sure that they’re legitimate, signed, and verified.

On this article, we’ve supplied a high-level overview of the content material updates we use in Intercept X – exploring what they’re, how typically they’re delivered, how they’re validated and verified, the particular low-privileged processes they’re loaded into, and the strategies we use to roll them out in a staged and managed method.

As we alluded to in our earlier article on Intercept X kernel drivers, balancing safety and security is dangerous – however we’re dedicated to managing that threat, as transparently as doable.

Why Scott Peterson is responsible, defined

codesanitize
-
0
Why Scott Peterson is responsible, defined


In 2004, in one of the crucial high-profile trials of the previous twenty years, Scott Peterson was convicted of murdering his spouse, Laci Peterson, 27, and their unborn son, Conner, with whom Laci was eight months pregnant. Now, two totally different new docuseries on the case — Netflix’s American Homicide: Laci Peterson (launched August 14) and Peacock’s Face to Face with Scott Peterson (releasing August 20) take totally different approaches to Peterson’s conviction and unresolved questions on what occurred when Laci disappeared from their residence in Modesto, California, on Christmas Eve in 2002.

The following media frenzy over her disappearance drove nationwide headlines for months. In spring of 2003, the our bodies of each mom and son washed up in San Francisco Bay, just some miles from the place Peterson had gone fishing the day Laci disappeared.

It’s uncommon for a prison prosecution to have as a lot incriminating circumstantial proof pointing towards the guilt of a single particular person as prosecutors had within the case of Scott Peterson — “overwhelming proof” with “no different affordable clarification,” as one lawyer who adopted the trial described on the time. The invention included 42,000 pages of paperwork. The proof in opposition to Peterson included weeks of obvious planning, forensic proof together with mitochondrial DNA, and months of suspicious habits each earlier than and after the very fact. But ever since a controversial 2017 docuseries helped flow into the concept the case in opposition to Peterson was manufactured by a media circus moderately than the info of the investigation, websleuths have more and more latched on to and bolstered perception in Peterson’s innocence.

Final week, the Los Angeles Innocence Mission introduced that they’d taken on Peterson’s case, making a “declare of precise innocence that’s supported by newly found proof.” It’s unclear what that proof may be, however hypothesis has run rampant, primarily specializing in particulars associated to an notorious however unconnected theft that occurred throughout the road across the time of Laci’s dying.

So how did we wind up right here? It’s at all times wholesome for the justice system to bear scrutiny; in spite of everything, the courtroom has already discovered that Peterson’s penalty part was unjust. In 2020, Peterson’s authentic dying sentence was overturned as a consequence of improper jury choice, and he was resentenced to life with out parole. That’s arguably consequence, a case of the justice system self-correcting.

But the campaign for Peterson’s innocence appears to have little or no to do with justice and even the precise info of the case and extra to do with exterior influences — from the bandwagon impact to the outsize affect of some podcasters and the gamification of true crime itself.

A media circus doesn’t a false conviction make

Should you keep in mind something concerning the Scott Peterson case, you doubtless keep in mind the Amber Frey of all of it: Frey, Peterson’s girlfriend, discovered herself thrust into the middle of a high-profile crime and beneath a relentless media highlight after she got here ahead to police. Frey didn’t know Peterson was married; he had informed her weeks earlier than Laci’s disappearance that he had misplaced his spouse.

Frey was a star witness for the prosecution, a take-no-BS sort who cooperated with authorities for months and made recordings of her conversations with Peterson. These included a infamous cellphone name Peterson made to her on New Yr’s Eve whereas attending a candlelight vigil for his murdered spouse, through which he claimed to be in Paris, pretending the background noise of all Laci’s mournful supporters was coming from vacationers on the Eiffel Tower.

(Should you didn’t know that was an actual factor that occurred, then howdy and welcome to a very head-turning case.)

You in all probability additionally keep in mind the incessant media protection of this case on the peak of the 24-hour TV information cycle. Peterson’s notorious interview with Diane Sawyer, through which he laughed in all of the fallacious locations, led to limitless evaluation of his psychology and what it mentioned about his guilt or innocence. In the meantime, Frey appeared in an incendiary press convention, the place she mentioned the litany of lies Peterson had fed her each earlier than and after Laci’s disappearance.

Latest advocates for Peterson’s innocence have closely implied that the media created a false narrative of his guilt. This idea was a core a part of Peterson’s denied 2012 attraction, in addition to A&E’s inflammatory docuseries The Homicide of Laci Peterson. However there’s a distinction between media curiosity in a case and media manipulation of a case. Actually, a lot of the contemporaneous reporting on the Peterson trial was truthful and even sympathetic to the protection.

The truth is that no quantity of media sympathy may totally ameliorate the harm created by Peterson’s personal habits.

Scott Peterson by no means wanted the media’s assist to look responsible

Scott Peterson appeared to have the proper life: job, a fantastic, sensible spouse who adored him, and a child on the best way. However (cease us in the event you’ve heard this one earlier than) not all the pieces was because it appeared. Peterson had been dishonest on Laci with a string of girls since at the least the start of their five-year marriage. He didn’t need to be a father and informed family he was “hoping for infertility.” Including to the strain was the extreme monetary pressure he was beneath; his enterprise was failing, and two-thirds of his paycheck went towards paying off loans and curiosity on $20,000 in bank card debt.

On the morning of December 24, 2002, Scott Peterson claimed to have left Laci — his eight-and-a-half-month-pregnant spouse — getting ready to do some intense housecleaning, whereas he stopped off at his warehouse after which went fishing.

Peterson would later inform authorities that he determined to take an impromptu fishing journey to Berkeley Marina, round 90 miles away and previous a number of different extra handy our bodies of water. He had beforehand informed a number of neighbors and family that he deliberate to go {golfing} that day, and later lied to some of them about the place he’d gone. As a proof, he would declare to police that he determined it was “too chilly” to go {golfing}, so by his telling, he spontaneously determined to go sit in a ship on the windy bay in 40-degree climate as a substitute.

However nothing concerning the journey to the marina was spontaneous. Peterson, who was not a daily fisherman — he hadn’t had a daily fishing license since 1994 — started researching fishing boats to purchase on December 7, 2002. On December 8, he did in depth internet searches for fishing provides and tidal currents across the bay space, even zooming in on Brooks Island, the place authorities imagine he took Laci’s physique on Christmas Eve. He paid money for a small fishing boat on December 9 — the similar day that he informed Amber Frey that he had “misplaced” his spouse and that this could be his first Christmas with out her. On December 23, the day earlier than his supposedly unplanned fishing journey, he bought a fishing license legitimate for 2 days solely.

Though he initially lied and informed police he left residence on Christmas Eve at 9:30 am, cellphone data positioned him at or close to residence at 10:08 am, simply 10 minutes earlier than a neighbor discovered Laci’s canine working unfastened on the street and returned him to the Petersons’ yard. After finally driving to Berkeley Marina and fishing there for lower than an hour, he arrived again residence at round 4:30 pm, washed his fishing garments, ate some pizza, after which known as Laci’s mom to inform her that her daughter was “lacking.”

Regardless of the reams of circumstantial proof, direct proof within the case was scant. Peterson’s blood was discovered on the door of his truck, for which he gave conflicting explanations. A couple of drops of blood have been additionally discovered on their bed room comforter. Caught in a pair of pliers recovered from Peterson’s boat, police discovered hair matched to Laci’s by way of mitochondrial DNA testing, an inconclusive however nonetheless genetic match — however Laci allegedly by no means knew concerning the boat. Prosecutors additionally discovered proof that he’d made a number of cement anchors, solely one among which was positioned, and which they believed he used to overwhelm Laci’s physique.

Peterson’s odd habits continued after Laci disappeared. He made unusual statements to associates and family concerning the cuts on his hand; he displayed a prevailing lack of emotion; he appeared reluctant to take part in search events to search for her or press conferences about her.

His cooperation with police “was at all times conditional,” investigators informed Folks in 2005. “He was involved concerning the fallacious issues.” He made repeated non-fishing journeys to the marina, 90 miles away, solely to “stare into the bay” after which depart once more after a couple of minutes. This was in January, months earlier than Laci’s physique would finally be discovered within the bay.

The identical day their our bodies have been recognized, Scott Peterson dyed his hair, borrowed his brother’s picture ID, and headed for the Mexico border with over $10,000 in money. The ultimate jury wanted simply seven hours to convict him and in the end sentence him to dying.

Innocence advocates need to ignore a lot of the proof to make their case

The greatest argument Peterson’s defenders have that one other perpetrator dedicated the murders is {that a} housebreaking occurred simply down the road. Peterson and his advocates argue that the 2 perpetrators of that housebreaking, Donald Pearce and Steven Todd, burgled the home on the morning of December 24 and that within the course of, they kidnapped Laci Peterson. Since (in accordance with Peterson) Laci was strolling her canine that morning, his supporters sometimes imagine she should have run throughout the burglars in the midst of the theft, attracted their consideration, and been murdered because of this. They theorize that Pearce and Todd waited for a number of days after which dumped her physique within the area of the bay the place Scott Peterson went fishing on December 24, all as a way to body him for the homicide.

However this concept doesn’t stand as much as scrutiny, for quite a few causes. Even when we settle for the absurd speculation that two thieves would abduct and kill a pedestrian in broad daylight, do nothing about it for a day or two till their homicide sufferer turned headline information, after which danger driving 90 miles to dump the high-profile sufferer’s physique in an space the place they already knew police have been looking out, all to border a husband whom police already suspected, the timeline doesn’t work.

Laci went lacking on December 24. The robbers didn’t break into the neighboring home till the morning of the twenty sixth. Each Pearce and Todd have been investigated and cleared by investigators in 2003, and each cooperated totally with police. And even when the robbers may have lied about after they broke into the house, that nonetheless doesn’t work, as a result of the residents of the house they robbed, the Medina household, didn’t depart their home on December 24 till roughly 10:33 am based mostly on their cellphone data — practically a half hour after Scott Peterson left and quarter-hour after the canine was seen wandering the streets solo.

One other conspiracy idea was one initially touted by Peterson’s protection at trial: the concept Laci was killed as a part of a ritual sacrifice and that Conner was faraway from the womb alive. The primary cause such a ridiculous idea may emerge (a idea dismissed by media on the time as traditional satanic panic) is that the our bodies washed ashore at totally different instances; nevertheless, the pathologist who carried out the autopsies on each our bodies was assured that Conner died within the womb on account of his mom’s dying.

Among the many most typical causes individuals give for arguing that Laci was nonetheless alive and effectively on the morning of the twenty fourth is that a number of witnesses claimed to have seen her strolling her canine. However in accordance with investigators, none of these eyewitness studies have been constant or verifiable. Many have been based mostly on media studies of what Laci was sporting — studies that initially got here from Peterson, who claimed that Laci had been sporting black pants. When her physique was discovered, nevertheless, she was sporting khaki pants. This matched what her sister had seen her sporting the night time of December 23 — the night time authorities imagine Peterson murdered her.

How do we all know when somebody is responsible of homicide?

One of many pitfalls of dwelling in an period of superior forensic science is that it’s simpler for a protection to argue {that a} dearth of forensics should equate to a dearth of proof. However for many of human historical past, the first manner we’ve determined whodunnit is by accumulating good old school clues — that’s, circumstantial proof. Circumstantial proof isn’t at all times compelling, and it could actually typically be defined away successfully by a defendant. However the extra there may be of it, the much less affordable alternate explanations change into. In Scott Peterson’s case, he and his protection staff have prepared solutions for each piece of incriminating proof in opposition to him, aside from the most important query of all: Why is there a lot incriminating proof in opposition to him?

As a society, we pay a number of consideration to what it means to show one thing past an inexpensive doubt. We spend a lot much less time considering what unreasonable doubt may appear like. Maybe we needs to be paying extra consideration to the latter, if solely so extra instances like this one don’t squander an excessive amount of of our cultural time and a focus. The variety of true crime devotees and influencers who imagine in Peterson’s innocence could also be rising, however not each declare of innocence is constructed on rational considering.

To justify Scott Peterson’s habits, it’s a must to posit a set of extraordinary circumstances, together with that he simply so occurred to say his spouse’s demise to his girlfriend, coincidentally in the exact same week he abruptly evinced an curiosity in fishing for the primary time for the reason that ’90s, coincidentally shopping for the identical boat the place her hair would later be discovered, after he coincidentally went fishing in the identical area of the bay the place her physique would finally be discovered, all whereas coincidentally mendacity repeatedly about his personal actions. In a fictional situation, it may be enjoyable to think about that every one these particulars may very well be the results of some weird shock clarification. However in the actual world, a world the place murder by their intimate companions is a number one reason behind dying for pregnant ladies, we all know higher.

Or at the least we must always — if just for the sake of the subsequent Laci Peterson.

Replace, August 19, 11:36 am: This piece was initially revealed on January 29, 2024, and has been up to date with information of two new documentaries concerning the Laci Peterson case.



TigerEye Introduces DuckDB.dart to Facilitate Information-Intensive App Improvement

codesanitize
-
0
TigerEye Introduces DuckDB.dart to Facilitate Information-Intensive App Improvement


(PhotoJuli86/Shutterstock)

TigerEye Labs, an AI-powered planning and income administration platform, has introduced the open-source launch of DuckDB.dart, an open-source software that permits builders to construct and run data-intensive purposes extra effectively. 

DuckDB.dart, a local Dart API for DuckDB, allows builders to construct apps throughout varied cellular and desktop environments, together with iOS, Android, Linux, and Home windows.

As DuckDB.dart is particularly designed for analytical queries, it might probably deal with giant datasets and complicated queries extra effectively inside a single machine in comparison with different applied sciences like SQLite, which is geared extra towards general-purpose database administration.

With its excessive efficiency and the flexibility to deal with giant datasets domestically, DuckDB has seen speedy development lately, although it nonetheless presents a steep studying curve. Now, with TigerEye Labs creating the brand new DuckDB.dart API, the platform is changing into extra accessible and simpler to make use of for knowledge evaluation and simulation.

DuckDB.dart leverages DuckDB’s highly effective C APIs to deliver high-performance knowledge dealing with to Dart purposes. The platform’s columnar format improves effectivity for sure forms of queries. Mixed with the vectorized execution, the format permits for quicker downloads and environment friendly knowledge evaluation, whereas additionally minimizing reminiscence utilization on units. 

DuckDB was initially developed in 2019 by Mark Raasveldt and Hannes Mühleisen on the Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica (CWI) within the Netherlands. Initially, the founders didn’t anticipate their open-source venture to turn out to be so fashionable and well-recognized within the knowledge administration and analytics communities. Final month, DuckDB achieved 6.7 million downloads. 

“We’re delighted to see the discharge of DuckDB.dart as we imagine cellular platforms are the following large frontier for DuckDB,” says Hannes Mühleisen, CEO and co-founder at DuckDB Labs. “We’re grateful for TigerEye’s dedication to making a Dart API for DuckDB and making it open-source from the beginning. Being overtly accessible ensures that everybody can use this library, which aligns with our imaginative and prescient of making a free analytical database administration system that may be deployed wherever.”

Hannes Mühleisen is the chief of the CWI crew that created DuckDB and the CEO and co-founder of DuckDB Labs

Amid DuckDB’s spectacular development, Hannes Mühleisen has additionally been acknowledged as one in every of Datanami’s Individuals to Watch in 2024. Mühleisen instructed Datanami that he hopes “selecting DuckDB for knowledge processing will turn out to be a no brainer”. He additionally shared that the choice to not go for enterprise capital allowed DuckDB to develop steadily, with out the standard pressures of exterior funding. 

Ralph Gootee, CTO and co-founder of TigerEye, shared, “Our clients profit because the group helps enhance the software program. Open supply goes past simply serving our clients; it’s about offering worth to the world.”

In accordance with Gootee, DuckDB’s capacity to permit customers to carry out highly effective knowledge manipulation instantly inside the software, quite than on a server affords a key benefit in comparison with typical knowledge programs. He additionally believes with DuckDB built-in into Dart, there’s nice potential in creating high-performance enterprise software program that’s safer and environment friendly than present cloud choices. 

TigerEye’s funding in DuckDB and Dart underscores the corporate’s dedication to advancing expertise and bettering efficiency. The Android and iOS ports for DartDB.dart will guarantee dependable knowledge entry to gross sales groups on the go, enhancing their capacity to deal with real-time operational wants. 

DuckDB.dart additionally affords multi-threaded database assist that permits concurrent processing of database operations. The platform additionally options ready statements and appenders that optimize question efficiency by lowering the execution time for repeated queries. TigerEye will current DuckDB.dart at DuckCon #5 in Seattle.

Associated Gadgets 

Is Large Information Useless? MotherDuck Raises $47M to Show It

Who’s Profitable in Open Supply Information Tech

Databricks to Open Supply Unity Catalog

 

Questions on Agile Leaders? Get Solutions from Mike Cohn

codesanitize
-
0
Questions on Agile Leaders? Get Solutions from Mike Cohn


I get requested large questions on agile management practically on daily basis. So I believed I’d seize three of probably the most generally requested questions and share fast solutions with you. (These solutions come from my YouTube shorts, which I publish weekly.)

What Is an Agile Chief?

Three qualities outline an agile chief.

First, agile leaders are comfy with uncertainty. They’re keen to listen to and say, “I don’t know.” They perceive not every thing will be acknowledged with certainty. This implies they will settle for it when a workforce says they’ll be achieved in 5 or 6 months.

Second, agile leaders information; they don’t command. An agile chief doesn’t inform individuals the precise steps to take to attain a objective. As a substitute, the agile chief creates a tradition of teamwork, transparency, and steady enchancment. This setting empowers workforce members to attain nice issues.

Third, agile leaders do much less however accomplish extra. Agile leaders are hardly ever a flurry of exercise. As a substitute, they encourage and encourage others to do extra of the appropriate issues.

Jazz nice Thelonious Monk was identified for leaving silence between the notes he performed. He stated, “What you do not play will be extra essential than what you do.”

Like Monk, an agile chief is aware of that what they don’t do–the place they go away house–will be extra essential than what they do.

How Do Agile Leaders Make the Case for Change?

Agile leaders know that the easiest way to steer others is to concentrate on one compelling cause for change. They don’t attempt to persuade individuals with a listing of advantages.

Let me clarify why. If you happen to inform me there are 4 causes I ought to make a change I don’t wish to make, I’m going to select the weakest of your 4 factors and argue about it. My argument could not persuade you, however I’ll persuade myself that I’ve parried that time. And with one much less level in favor of the change you wish to make, I’ll additionally persuade myself I can proceed resisting.

So, don’t attempt to persuade somebody with a listing of causes agile is best than what you’re doing at present. As a substitute, concentrate on one compelling cause.

Agile Leaders Create a Protected Setting for Studying

When workforce members are working towards a brand new ability, good agile leaders know they’ve one large job to do to ensure workforce members really feel protected to study. That job? Making certain workforce members know that their efforts matter greater than the outcomes.

A groups’ efforts at studying new abilities ought to be thought-about experiments or trials. Extra essential than succeeding on the new ability is making an attempt till they do succeed.

Set life like targets. Handle expectations of how a lot a workforce can accomplish of their early sprints.

Need Extra Fast Solutions to Huge Questions?

Comply with me on YouTube, the place I create weekly quick movies that reply the massive questions you will have about agile and Scrum. If you happen to’ve received time for a deeper dive, I additionally create weekly lengthy movies the place I provide you with recommendations on easy methods to clear up frequent points that bathroom down agile groups.

1...3,7833,7843,785...3,806Page 3,784 of 3,806

ABOUT US

Welcome to CodeSanitize, your number one source for all things coding and technology. We’re dedicated to providing you the very best of software development tutorials, tips, and resources, with a focus on clarity, practical examples, and up-to-date content.

© Copyright 2024 - codesanitize.com. All rights reserved