High 5 AppSec Shopping for Pitfalls from Gartner’s 2025 Report

Selecting the unsuitable AST (Software Safety Testing) platform does not simply waste your finances. It results in:

• Slower launch cycles
• Burned-out builders
• Incomplete protection throughout CI/CD
• Publicity to compliance fines and zero-day dangers

In its newest analysis, “How one can Keep away from Frequent Pitfalls in Deciding on Software Safety Testing Instruments,” Gartner highlights the 5 commonest errors safety leaders make when evaluating AST platforms.

On this weblog, we break down Gartner’s key insights and share what groups ought to search for when selecting a device that works in the true world.

Key takeaways

• Appknox is listed as a Pattern Vendor in Gartner’s AST tooling report (2025).
• Most firms make avoidable errors when evaluating utility safety platforms.
• Avoiding these pitfalls can save time, compliance complications, and developer friction.

Pitfall #1: Over-prioritizing demo accuracy

Focusing solely on false positives throughout a demo is like test-driving a automobile primarily based on the cupholders.

Gartner warns that organizations typically prioritize scan accuracy throughout PoCs however neglect developer expertise, integration ease, and remediation pace, which finally drive success or failure.

What to ask as an alternative?

• Will your builders know what to repair, and the way?
• How rapidly can outcomes be triaged?
• Can it triage alerts primarily based on severity and exploitability?
• Does it combine with instruments like Jira, Slack, or your CI/CD?
• Can the device combine into your CI/CD pipeline? 

Pitfall #2: Shopping for level instruments as an alternative of unified platforms

Device sprawl is the silent killer of AppSec velocity.

Groups that undertake separate instruments for SAST, DAST, API testing, and runtime checks typically face integration gaps, overlapping alerts, and delayed remediation.

What to prioritize?

• Platforms that unify scans throughout:
  
  • Supply code
  • Binaries
  • APIs
  • Cell SDKs
• Single-pane-of-glass visibility for safety + dev groups
  
• Platforms that:
  • Help a number of testing sorts
  • Consolidate findings
  • Supply end-to-end protection, from code to runtime.

Pitfall #3: Ignoring deployment and information residency wants

It’s simple to miss the place your AppSec device will run till authorized and compliance groups step in.

Particularly in regulated sectors or worldwide rollouts, cloud-only fashions is probably not sufficient.

What to search for?

Distributors providing:

• Distributors that supply versatile deployment choices – public cloud, personal cloud, or on-premise
• Area-aware information movement mapping and compliance
• Geo-risk visibility (like Appknox’s Privateness Defend)

Pitfall #4: Underestimating post-sale help

Safety instruments aren’t only a transaction; they’re a relationship.

Gartner stresses the significance of evaluating vendor responsiveness, roadmap alignment, and buyer success capabilities, all of which matter extra after the deal is signed.

What do you have to ask in your demo session?

• Direct entry to technical help
• Readability on roadmap priorities
• Proof of ongoing engagement past onboarding.

Pitfall #5: Leaving builders out of the equation

The perfect AppSec instruments make builders a part of the answer, not the issue.

Instruments that don’t align with dev workflows might be ignored, bypassed, or resisted. Gartner recommends prioritizing usability, quick suggestions, and non-blocking remediation flows.

What to search for as an alternative?

Instruments that supply:

• Developer-friendly scan outcomes
• Contextual steerage
• CI-native instruments (Jenkins, GitHub, GitLab)
• Quick suggestions loops
• Non-blocking scans (dev velocity preserved)
• Seamless integration into IDEs, CI/CD techniques, or ticketing platforms

Comparability desk: Pitfalls vs. what to prioritize

Ultimate thought

AppSec instruments fail for one in all two causes: both the crew cannot scale them, or the builders received’t use them.

Gartner’s report is a reminder to decide on a device that sits proper with the fact of your crew, with your folks, your course of, and your compliance wants, not simply what shines within the demo.

In case you are evaluating AST platforms at this time, these 5 checkpoints might prevent time, cash, and post-purchase remorse.

The place Appknox stands

Appknox is proud to be acknowledged by Gartner on this 12 months’s AST report, not as a result of we checked a field, however as a result of we’ve constructed an answer designed for the actuality of recent safety groups.

Wish to see what a developer-friendly, mobile-first AppSec platform actually appears to be like like? 

E book a demo with Appkox

Gartner attribution

Gartner, “How one can Keep away from Frequent Pitfalls in Deciding on Software Safety Testing Instruments,” Dale Gardner, 10 July 2025. GARTNER is a registered trademark and repair mark of Gartner, Inc. and/or its associates and is used herein with permission. All rights reserved.