Checkmarx is a well-liked SAST, DAST, and SCA supplier that helps organizations detect and repair vulnerabilities and guarantee utility safety. Its sturdy testing capabilities make it a go-to alternative for a lot of enterprises seeking to combine safety into their DevSecOps pipeline.
Nevertheless, like all instruments, Checkmarx has sure limitations. Some customers discover it costly and complicated to arrange, whereas others report lengthy scan occasions and occasional false positives, which decelerate improvement workflows.
If you happen to’re exploring different choices for securing your functions, listed below are the most effective Checkmarx options, which supply a mixture of highly effective and environment friendly safety options.
Why contemplate Checkmarx options?
Listed here are a couple of the reason why you would possibly need to contemplate Checkmarx options for utility safety testing:
1. Person expertise and interface
Navigating the feature-rich platform and deciphering outcomes can generally really feel overwhelming. For optimum use, a studying curve and experience are required.
2. False positives
Some customers report that Checkmarx can generate a excessive variety of false positives and negatives, making it tough to verify manually and establish safety vulnerabilities. Consequently, your DevSecOps groups will waste extra time triaging and resolving points.
Professional tip: The most effective Checkmarx options, like Appknox, have false positives of lower than 1% in comparison with the cell utility safety business benchmark of 5%.
This is because of a mixture of automated scans and handbook testing.
3. Efficiency and pace
Checkmarx will be gradual, particularly when coping with massive code bases or advanced functions. Lengthy wait occasions for vulnerability scans are usually not ultimate in a fast-paced improvement surroundings the place pace is a precedence.
4. Advanced setup and preliminary configuration
Implementing superior options requires substantial configuration, tuning, and time, once more losing time for safety groups.
5. Pricing
Checkmarx’s pricing fashions are based mostly on the variety of functions or traces of code, so it may not present probably the most cost-effective answer for you in case you’re on a decent funds.
Professional tip: When you’ve gotten a number of apps in your ecosystem, contemplate selecting instruments with versatile, usage-based pricing.
6. Restricted language and framework assist
Checkmarx helps many languages, however limitations stay, particularly with newer or framework-specific vulnerabilities. Whereas latest updates improved JavaScript scanning efficiency, assist for frameworks like Angular and React should be incomplete.
7. Integration challenges
The device affords restricted integration capabilities with different instruments within the software program improvement lifecycle (SDLC). The combination course of will be advanced, as it could require your DevSecOps staff to take a position extra time and assets in adapting to the device’s workflow.
Prime 7 Checkmarx Options in 2025
1. Appknox
Appknox is a complete mobile-first VA device that provides a set of safety testing options, similar to automated
Our penetration testing providers mix handbook experience with automated instruments, making certain an intensive and efficient safety evaluation.
Certainly one of Appknox’s key strengths is its ease of use, which makes safety testing accessible to anybody in your staff. The platform additionally affords detailed but easy-to-understand experiences with clear insights into vulnerabilities, threat ranges, and actionable remediation steps, making it simple to share along with your stakeholders and non-technical customers.
This dedication to hurry, accuracy, and user-friendly safety testing led to Appknox being acknowledged as a ‘Sturdy Performer’ in Gartner’s Voice of the Buyer for Utility Safety Testing in 2024, incomes the best buyer scores. This acknowledgment is a testomony to our clients’ belief in us and our influence.
Components |
Appknox strengths in opposition to Checkmarx |
Ease of use |
Provides intuitive, user-friendly interface for testers and CISOs to attenuate onboarding time |
Scan pace |
Speedy scan capabilities, below 60 minutes |
Accuracy |
<1% false positives and negatives to enhance effectivity in vulnerability administration |
Integration |
Seamless integration into the CI/CD pipelines |
Protection |
Intensive language and framework protection suited to numerous utility sorts |
DAST |
Automated DAST scans on actual units, making certain a 75% faster testing and decreased false positives |
Compliance administration |
Appknox simplifies compliance administration by figuring out vulnerabilities and making certain adherence to requirements similar to GDPR, PCI DSS, NIST, and HIPAA. |
Key options
SAST
Appknox’s automated SAST scans app binaries in a non-runtime surroundings, figuring out vulnerabilities early within the SDLC for sooner, safer improvement.
DAST
Appknox’s DAST analyzes real-time consumer interactions to detect runtime vulnerabilities, decreasing false positives and expediting safe app releases by 75%.
API safety
Seamlessly built-in with automated DAST, Appknox’s API safety testing identifies and resolves API vulnerabilities, making certain sturdy endpoint safety.
SBOM
Appknox’s SBOM offers an in depth checklist of your app’s elements, making it simpler to identify vulnerabilities and handle third-party dangers while not having supply code.
Storeknox
Storeknox repeatedly displays your apps throughout totally different shops, detecting faux apps and threats like malware or phishing so you possibly can keep proactive about safety even after deployment.
Professionals
- Lower than 1% false positives fee
- Cellular-first vulnerability evaluation
- DAST completed on actual units, not emulators
- CVSS experiences in lower than 90 minutes
- Provides detailed experiences highlighting points and the following steps to observe
- Provides an intuitive dashboard to navigate experiences, monitor safety tendencies, and combine findings seamlessly into their workflow
- Remediation name with safety specialists
- Integrates into the CI/CD pipelines to detect vulnerabilities early
Pricing
Appknox affords versatile, usage-based pricing with add-ons for handbook testing, making it a prime Checkmarx different.
Buyer ranking
2. Veracode
Veracode is a safety testing platform that integrates SAST, DAST, SCA, IaC scanning, and penetration testing.
This Checkmarx different streamlines safety throughout numerous improvement environments, helps 100+ programming languages, and affords AI-powered remediation.
It prioritizes vulnerabilities based mostly on severity and exploitability whereas providing AI-driven steering and automatic fixes, serving to resolve points shortly.
Professionals
- Provides static (SAST) and dynamic (DAST) utility safety testing, Software program Composition Evaluation (SCA), and handbook penetration testing, primarily concentrating on net functions and enterprise software program
- Combines handbook and automatic scanning to make sure excessive safety for functions
Cons
- Not a mobile-first safety testing device
- Doesn’t present mobile-specific DAST, API testing, or real-device scanning like Appknox
Pricing
Score
3. SonarQube
SonarQube is a code high quality assurance device that performs static code evaluation that will help you establish and resolve points within the utility’s code. It helps over 29 programming languages, together with Python, PHP, Kotlin, and Swift.
As a Checkmarx competitor, it scans the supply code for widespread safety points, similar to SQL injections, cross-site scripting (XSS), and buffer overflows. This lets you handle these dangers earlier than they turn out to be issues within the utility.
Professionals
- With complete code high quality evaluation, it offers detailed insights into code high quality, protecting points similar to code smells, bugs, and maintainability points
- Helps a wide selection of programming languages, making it versatile for numerous improvement environments
Cons
- Primarily designed for code high quality evaluation and will not cowl all safety points comprehensively – like in-depth evaluation tailor-made for cell functions and platforms
- As a cloud-based service, it isn’t ultimate for organizations with strict on-premises necessities or information residency considerations
Pricing
- Free: $0
- Crew: $32 per thirty days
- Enterprise: Customized pricing
Score
4. Snyk
The Checkmarx different scans supply code for safety vulnerabilities and offers automated fixes. It streamlines vulnerability remediation by routinely producing pull requests with mandatory patches, decreasing handbook effort and accelerating the fixing course of.
The cloud-based safety platform Snyk prioritizes vulnerabilities based mostly on reachability and publicity, making certain that improvement groups give attention to probably the most vital dangers first.
Professionals
- Focuses on a developer-first strategy
- Offers broad protection throughout varied points of utility safety with SAST, SCA, container safety, and IaC scanning
Cons
- Lacks mobile-first safety testing for platforms similar to Android and iOS
- In contrast to Checkmarx, you can’t create customizable safety guidelines, making it much less ultimate for organizations that must tailor safety evaluation to their particular wants
Pricing
- Free: $0
- Crew: $25/month per consumer
- Enterprise: Customized pricing
Score
Instructed learn: Prime 7 cell utility safety testing instruments for enterprises
5. OWASP ZAP
OWASP ZAP (Zed Assault Proxy) by Checkmarx is an open-source penetration testing device that acts as a proxy between an internet utility and a consumer’s browser.
Consider it as a free Checkmarx different for intercepting, analyzing, and modifying HTTP and HTTPS site visitors.
ZAP can carry out each passive and energetic scans. Passive scanning examines site visitors for vulnerabilities with out altering requests or responses, whereas energetic scanning simulates assaults to detect deeper safety flaws.
Professionals
- The interface is user-friendly
- Provides detailed experiences in HTML, XML, and JSON codecs
- Customising ZAP in response to your testing wants is straightforward
Cons
- No common updates as it’s open supply and free
- Lacks a mobile-first safety testing strategy
Pricing
Score
6. Invicti
The online utility safety device Invicti automates the detection of vulnerabilities in web sites, net functions, and APIs by SAST, DAST, IAST, container, and API safety scans.
With proof-based scanning, Invicti routinely verifies detected vulnerabilities to cut back false positives and provides your safety groups actionable insights for remediation.
Professionals
- Offers a variety of customization choices to scan any net utility
- Detects a variety of safety points, together with SQL Injection, distant code execution, and Cross-Web site Scripting (XSS)
Cons
- Fails to supply dynamic testing for mobile-first functions
- Lacks CSV reporting, making it tough to combine with customized reporting templates
Pricing
Score
7. Fortify by OpenText
OpenText Fortify affords SAST and DAST to establish vulnerabilities in supply code and reside functions. Whereas the SAST helps scanning supply code, binaries, and bytecode, the DAST checks functions throughout runtime.
Fortify’s SCA helps detect points inside third-party libraries and open-source elements.
The platform offers a centralized safety dashboard, supplying you with a unified view to prioritize vulnerabilities throughout a number of tasks. It additionally affords detailed safety experiences with threat scoring and in depth remediation steering that will help you shortly handle vulnerabilities.
Professionals
- Offers an in depth description of the highlighted points
- Generates experiences in PDF to make it simple to current the output to stakeholders and for auditing
Cons
- Generates false positives at occasions with all of the SCA instruments
- Because it’s a cloud-based AppSec answer, it will not be ultimate for organizations that require on-premise/various infrastructure preferences
Pricing
Score
At a look: Checkmarx options
Instrument |
Key options |
Greatest for |
|
Greatest suited to groups who need quick, automated, mobile-first safety scans with minimal false positives |
|
Veracode |
Superb for enterprises needing a complete, multi-layered safety solution throughout the SDLC |
|
SonarQube |
Static code evaluation throughout 30+ programming languages |
Greatest for improvement groups targeted on steady code high quality and safety monitoring in a multi-language surroundings |
Synk |
|
Excellent for developer-first groups securing open-source dependencies and containerized functions in cloud-native environments |
OWASP ZAP |
Performs each automated and handbook safety testing for net functions |
Greatest for penetration testers and safety researchers on the lookout for a customizable open-source device for handbook safety testing |
Invicti |
|
Fitted to net utility safety groups needing quick, correct scans |
Fortify by OpenText |
Greatest for organizations that require a cloud-first AppSec answer |
TLDR: Selecting the best Checkmarx different
Ideally, cell utility safety doesn’t decelerate your safety groups. In actual fact, it empowers your groups to establish vulnerabilities inside minutes, not days, and push safe code with out bottlenecks.
And Appknox is a cell app safety software program answer that helps you simplify safety by making it an automatic course of built-in immediately into your CI/CD pipelines.
With <1% false positives and negatives, seamless integration into your workflow, real-time insights, and on-call assist from safety specialists, Appknox strengthens your utility safety with excessive accuracy and confidence.
Join a free trial to study extra about how Appknox will help you strengthen the safety of your whole utility portfolio.