Home Blog

Speed up device adoption with a developer experimentation framework


It’s crucial that enterprise leaders can allow their enterprise to work on the pace that expertise is shifting. Nonetheless, prolonged and cumbersome approval processes to undertake new instruments can hinder a corporation’s capability to maintain tempo, particularly when they should stay compliant with rules and requirements, comparable to FedRAMP and SOC-2. 

With a three-stage developer experimentation framework, organizations could make it simpler to guage new applied sciences, decide their match and speed up their adoption throughout the group.

Stage One: Trial

The aim of the primary stage entails exploratory testing to gauge how a growth device would possibly profit the group. The first goal is to determine concrete functions for the group via hands-on experimentation.

Throughout the trial stage, the device ought to be used solely by a small cohort of engineers whereas it’s nonetheless new, untested and unvetted. Moreover, the trial stage ought to be restricted to a brief time period for preliminary testing of the device to scale back danger and forestall prolonged use. This era ought to enable ample time for preliminary experimentation to find out the worth of a device and decide about whether or not to discover it in additional element.

Stage Two: Pilot

The pilot stage expands device entry to a broader group of builders to assemble extra suggestions. By rising utilization throughout varied growth groups, the device’s extra tangible advantages could be evaluated to find out whether or not full-scale implementation throughout the product growth group is suitable.

If an exterior vendor is getting used and the device is just not publicly out there on the web for obtain or use with out signup, a mutual non-disclosure settlement, or NDA, ought to be in place with the seller earlier than getting into the pilot stage. It will assist to make sure that any discussions held with the seller stay confidential.

The pilot stage should not exceed 4 to 6 weeks to stop the device from being “unofficially” utilized by a big set of builders for prolonged intervals of time. Groups can then collect adequate suggestions from a large sufficient viewers to make an correct resolution about whether or not the device ought to proceed to the rollout stage.

Stage Three: Rollout

The ultimate stage focuses on profitable rollout. 

The first goals embrace finishing thorough authorized and safety assessments, and creating an efficient deployment and enablement technique to make the device accessible throughout all engineering groups. Enablement is particularly important to assist drive broader adoption. With out adoption, the deployment could be meaningless.

A safety assessment of the device and its meant makes use of have to be carried out to make sure that the device is secure to make use of. The safety assessment should contain detailed evaluation of all the data the device will eat or entry, which is able to assist stop builders from placing themselves or the group below pointless danger. The device can even have to endure any procurement and new vendor onboarding processes the group might have in place.

Moreover, success metrics ought to be created to guage if a device truly achieves its aim, and may give attention to the device’s capability to fulfill the wants of the builders.

Streamlining Group-Vast Software Adoption

Expertise is consistently altering, and organizations can’t afford to be left behind. Enterprise leaders must be assured that the instruments that they’re implementing are sustainable and efficient long-term.

Establishing an experimentation framework allows organizations to streamline their device adoption course of to allow them to sustain with rising expertise developments. By abandoning any instruments that may get dominated out within the trial or pilot section, they will keep away from the danger of dedicating safety, authorized and procurement overhead to a device that will finally present inadequate worth.

subnet – DHCPv6 / IPv6 Ubiquiti EdgeOS/EdgeMax Prefix vs PD


When establishing DHCPv6 on EdgeRouter, I can run the a configuration instructions like the next:

set dhcpv6-pd pd 0 interface eth1 prefix-id :0
set dhcpv6-pd pd 0 interface eth2 prefix-id :1

This leads to the interfaces having totally different IPs:

2601:xxx:xxxx:7450::1/64
2601:xxx:xxxx:7451::1/64

I’m struggling to know what the pd 0 portion of the command controls, and I’m unable to seek out any documentation about these instructions to assist my understanding, and I am not super-familiar with IPv6 to fill within the gaps. I do know that if the CIDR block is just too small, you can’t create extra pds, however I am confused how this all ties collectively.

I am aware of IPv4 and subnetting/CIDR, and I am confused as a result of it seems IPv6 additionally helps subnetting/CIDR, however on high of that has a secondary ‘block’ kind (prefix-id) and doubtlessly a tertiary (pd)?!


Moreover, I believed that a part of IPv6 was its means to delegate IPs offered in a block to machines in your community, so I am attempting to know the distinction in setup between that, and a typical NAT/masquerade of a single WAN tackle from a separate subnet in your community (ie: ISP Provides you IP 1.1.1.1 and you utilize 192.168.1.0/24 in your community).


  1. What’s PD vs Prefix ID?
  2. How do PD and Prefix ID slot in with CIDR and understanding of IPv4 CIDR
  3. Does PD must do with delegation of extra IPs in a offered block or is it unrelated?
  4. Why does my eth0 IPv6 IP differ drastically than the IPs being handed out to the LAN? (ie: eth0 2001:…/128). I might count on this to be the primary tackle on the block, and the LAN machines take the extra addresses on the identical block, however this does not appear to be the case.

javascript – React Native: Keyboard instantly dismisses when typing in TextInput inside ScrollView


Downside
I’ve a React Native app the place the keyboard instantly dismisses after opening when customers attempt to kind in a TextInput element that is nested inside a ScrollView. This prevents any textual content enter from being entered.

Present Setup – Guardian Part (EnhancedTicketDetailScreen.js)

import { KeyboardAvoidingView, ScrollView, Platform } from 'react-native';
return ( 


  {/* Different content material */}
  
 );

Baby Part (JobProgressSection.js)

  

types –

const types = StyleSheet.create({
           notesInput: {
padding: 16,
fontSize: 16,
coloration: '#333',
minHeight: 120,
backgroundColor: '#fff',
borderRadius: 8,
borderWidth: 1,
borderColor: '#ddd',
textAlignVertical: 'prime',
            },
          });

What I’ve Tried

Totally different ScrollView props combos:

keyboardShouldPersistTaps=”dealt with”/”at all times”
keyboardDismissMode=”none”/”on-drag”
Varied contentInsetAdjustmentBehavior settings

TextInput prop variations:

blurOnSubmit={false}
scrollEnabled={false}
Totally different returnKeyType values

Container approaches:

TouchableWithoutFeedback wrapper (made it worse)
Totally different KeyboardAvoidingView behaviors
Adjusting keyboardVerticalOffset

Focus administration:

Utilizing refs with .focus() calls
Stopping blur occasions (precipitated infinite loops)

Anticipated Conduct

Consumer faucets the TextInput
Keyboard seems and stays open
Consumer can kind constantly
Keyboard solely dismisses when person explicitly closes it or faucets “Performed”

Precise Conduct

Consumer faucets the TextInput
Keyboard seems briefly (< 1 second)
Keyboard instantly dismisses
Can not enter any textual content

Console Logs
✅ Notes centered
❌ Notes blurred
✅ Notes centered
❌ Notes blurred
(repeats continually)
Further Context

This similar TextInput sample works completely in Modal parts
The difficulty solely happens when TextInput is inside a ScrollView
Downside impacts each job notes and modal varieties throughout the ScrollView
App has complicated navigation with React Navigation drawer + stack

Query
What’s the appropriate strategy to configure a TextInput inside a ScrollView inside a KeyboardAvoidingView in order that the keyboard stays open for steady typing?
I’ve seen comparable questions however most options contain libraries like react-native-keyboard-aware-scroll-view. Is there a strategy to remedy this with native React Native parts solely?

Can You Actually Hack a Radio Sign?


In 2017, a malicious actor exploited the alerts in Dallas’s emergency siren system and set off alarms for over 90 minutes. Most of these assaults can have an effect on gadgets that use radio frequency (RF) know-how, from sensible safety programs to plane. RF additionally performs a important function in lots of navy programs comparable to navigation, radar, and communication programs. Widespread DoD use instances embrace satellite tv for pc communication (SATCOM), radar, and tactical knowledge hyperlinks that assist coordinate troop actions, sign place details about a goal, or assist preserve communication between plane and drones. A current report indicated the DoD is prone to potential RF assault vectors, indicating the necessity to higher perceive and stop vulnerabilities.

On this RF 101 information, we discover among the fundamentals of radio frequency communication, delve into the generalities of protocols and machine interactions, talk about frequent RF instruments, and uncover methods malicious actors can assault programs. We summarize the fundamentals of RF know-how and the dangers related to it, and we talk about how the SEI helps to safe wi-fi communications.

RF Fundamentals

The electromagnetic spectrum covers your entire vary of electromagnetic waves from very lengthy radio waves to seen mild to very brief, high-energy radiation comparable to X-rays and gamma rays. The radio spectrum is a subset of the broader electromagnetic spectrum and ranges in frequency from 3 Hz to three,000 GHz. The flexibility of RF waves to propagate, or journey via completely different mediums, together with the vacuum of area, permits wi-fi communication with out the necessity for bodily connection. RF alerts are basic to trendy communication programs, which allow lots of immediately’s applied sciences together with tv, radio broadcasts, mobile communication, and Wi-Fi connections. Wi-fi RF communication additionally performs a significant function in area domains, comparable to satellite tv for pc communication to floor stations, which allow transmission of telemetry knowledge, GPS, and different alerts. The radio spectrum may be divided into standardized bands starting from extraordinarily low frequency (ELF) to tremendously excessive frequency (THF) as seen under.

figure1_06162025

Determine 1: The Electromagnetic Spectrum

figure2_06162025

Determine 2: Frequency Spectrum

What Are Protocols and RF Modules?

RF modules are small digital gadgets which might be used to transmit and obtain radio alerts between two gadgets which might be bodily separated. Transmitters are chargeable for transmitting radio waves that carry analog or digital info, and receivers obtain the radio waves and recuperate the data. That is the idea of a wi-fi communications channel, the open-space path via which info is transmitted through electromagnetic waves with out the usage of bodily connections comparable to wires or cables. The general sign is constructed of the service sign, a periodic waveform that conveys info through modulations that encode the analog or digital info. Modulation is the method of various a service sign to encode knowledge then demodulating that obtained sign to decode knowledge. Modulation methods decide how info is transmitted over radio waves, affecting the effectivity and high quality of communication.

figure3_06162025

Determine 3: Block Diagram of Digital Communication System

There are completely different ways in which the data may be modulated. Widespread analog modulations embrace amplitude modulation (AM) and frequency modulation (FM). AM modulates a better frequency service with a decrease frequency sign by adjusting the amplitude of the service sign. The frequency of the service is unaltered, however the amplitude varies always. FM modulates by making comparatively small changes to the frequency of the service. These two strategies characterize the sorts of RF alerts on the acquainted AM and FM radio bands. Widespread digital modulations, constructing on AM and FM, embrace amplitude shift keying (ASK) and frequency shift keying (FSK).

Inside a system, transmitters and receivers may be packaged collectively as transceivers, which carry out each capabilities. Moreover, system on a chip (SoC) configurations combine microcontrollers with the transceiver to permit protocol administration comparable to knowledge packetization.

figure4_06162025

Determine 4: Illustration of Indicators

Communication protocols are units of guidelines for the change of knowledge between the transmitter and receiver. They guarantee knowledge is transmitted in a constant format, permitting gadgets from completely different producers to speak effectively in the event that they respect the protocol. There are lots of completely different sorts of protocols in use. Essentially the most immediately recognizable communication protocol for a lot of is mobile wi-fi.

Mobile wi-fi is the business driver of the digital wi-fi communication revolution. From its business introduction greater than 30 years in the past for cellular voice communication, digital wi-fi know-how has developed, extending the web to our cellular gadgets. At a look:

The continued evolution of the world-wide mobile knowledge community is pushed by two organizations filling distinct however interconnected roles. The Worldwide Telecommunication Union (ITU), units the general necessities and tips for worldwide cellular telecommunications (IMT) requirements. The third Technology partnership Challenge (3GPP), a worldwide collaboration of economic, requirements, and different organizations, performs research after which develops technical specs for cellular communication applied sciences. The ITU guides, opinions, and approves 3GPP’s specs as worldwide requirements, making certain they meet world necessities.

The 3GPP parallel research and specification course of has maintained a cadence of a specification launch each one to 2 years since 1990. These embrace packet-switched knowledge, which offers “all the time on” connection, eliminating dial up and bettering entry to e-mail and internet providers. LTE Launch 8 carried out an adaptation utilizing QPSK, 16QAM, and 64QAM modulation. Later releases included further modulations. A timeline of commercially recognizable releases is offered within the desk under:

A Timeline of Cell Wi-fi Requirements

12 months

Launch

Title

Options

Modulation / Entry

Downlink Information Fee (bits/sec)

1992

Phase1

2G / GSM

GSM Commercially Provided DCS-1800

GMSK/TDMA

9.6 okay

1997

96

2G / GSM

Circuit Switched Consumer Information

GMSK/TDMA

14.4 okay

1998

97

2.5G / GPRS

Packet Switched Consumer Information

GMSK/TDMA

56-114k

1999

98

2.75G / EDGE

Enhanced GPRS

8PSK/TDMA

384 okay (max)

2000

99

3G / UMTS

W-CDMA  Interface

QPSK/W-CDMA

384 okay

2002

5

3G / UMTS

HSDPA

16QAM/W-CDMA

2-12 M

2008

8

4G / LTE

LTE Launched

OFDMA

5-100M

2018

15

5G / NR

NR Launched

OFDMA

100-1000M

Some further incessantly used wi-fi protocols embrace:

  • Wi-Fi: That is the acquainted wi-fi IEEE 802.11-based protocol that operates within the 2.4 GHz ISM Band with 14 channels spaced 5 MHz aside. In america, channels 1 via 11 are generally used, particularly channels 1, 6 and 11, that are the one non-overlapping channels. Wi-Fi is utilized in properties, metropolis infrastructures, geolocation, industrial environments, and Web of Issues (IoT) purposes.
  • Bluetooth low vitality: That is the acquainted low-power protocol utilized by numerous gadgets for close-proximity communication. It operates within the 2.4 GHz ISM Band. Frequency-hopping unfold spectrum (FHSS) is the modulation method used, and its band is split into 40 2-MHz channels. It’s utilized in sensible residence gadgets, healthcare purposes, location-based providers, and extra.
  • Zigbee: This low-power wi-fi mesh community protocol is below the IEEE 802.15.4 radio specification. It operates on the 868 MHz radio band in Europe, the 915 MHz radio band in North America and Australia, and globally at 2.4 GHz. It will possibly transmit over a distance of as much as 100 meters (line of sight) and might obtain uncooked knowledge throughput charges as much as 500 kbps. Zigbee operates on 16 mounted channels which might be 5 MHz aside within the 2.4 GHz band. It’s primarily utilized in residence automation, sensible vitality, wi-fi sensing and industrial automation.

figure5_06162025

Determine 5: Wi-Fi and Zigbee Channels

How Do Units Talk with One One other?

Units talk by encoding knowledge into modulated alerts on a service wave at a particular frequency. As seen in Determine 5, two Zigbee radios speaking on channel 19 can be speaking on the frequency of 2445 MHz.

Antennas are required in wi-fi communication since they’re chargeable for radiating alerts into the air (i.e., transmitter) and receiving the incoming alerts (i.e., receiver). Antenna designs are decided by the character of the communication utility, the supposed frequencies and modulation methodology, and high quality elements comparable to vary, bandwidth, and working atmosphere.

Multiplexing is a technique that enables a number of transmitted alerts or streams of knowledge to be shared over a single shared communication channel. Frequency division multiplexing permits a number of customers to ship knowledge via a single communication channel by dividing the full channel into a number of sub-channels with non-overlapping service frequencies. These sub-channels are allotted to separate customers or gadgets. For instance, Zigbee, as famous above, operates on 16 channels within the 2.4 GHz vary. Time division multiplexing schemes assist handle entry to a channel by allocating particular person customers or gadgets a particular timeslot for info transfers on the identical shared service frequency to keep away from colliding transmissions. Customers or gadgets transmit in fast succession, every with their very own timeslot. There are additionally extra complicated approaches to multiplexing comparable to code division multiplexing which use superior methods like direct sequence unfold spectrum or frequency-hopping unfold spectrum to permit customers entry to your entire bandwidth for your entire period of transmission by assigning every machine/consumer a novel, orthogonal code.

RF Assaults

RF assaults exploit vulnerabilities to intercept, disrupt, or manipulate programs and related protocols. The results of RF assaults can vary from knowledge breaches and lack of confidentiality to denial of service and disruption of important communications. An instance that illustrates RF safety dangers is railroad and practice jacking, as within the current Poland railway assault stopped 20 trains in 2023. As wi-fi know-how grows, so do the assault discipline and threats.

What Are Widespread Varieties of RF Assaults?

A number of frequent RF assault vectors exploit weaknesses in wi-fi communications. Widespread vectors embrace the next:

  • Eavesdropping includes intercepting and listening to wi-fi communications with out authorization. This will enable a malicious actor to realize entry to delicate info comparable to passwords, authentication processes, private info, or import system processes. Attackers can make the most of software-defined radios (SDRs) to seize and decode transmitted knowledge in a versatile method, enabling attackers to quickly adapt as they study extra about frequencies, modulation methods, and protocols.
  • Replay assaults, that are analogous to man-in-the-middle (MITM) assaults in cybersecurity, happen when an attacker captures legitimate transmissions after which retransmits them to impersonate a respectable machine or consumer. These assaults can bypass authentication or achieve unauthorized entry to programs. For instance, a malicious actor may sniff the transmissions that carry the code from a wise lock to unlock/lock a door or sniff and replay the rolling code from a car’s key fob to acquire entrance to a automotive.
  • Relay assaults improve a sound radio sign and use it to entry a sound goal. In contrast to a replay assault, which captures and resends the sign, a relay assault permits a sign to journey farther and be used at longer distances. Sensible fobs and keys are prone to this kind of assault.
  • Jamming is a denial-of-service assault the place the attacker transmits radio alerts on the identical frequency because the focused communication, successfully disrupting or blocking the respectable alerts. This will forestall gadgets from speaking, which might result in service outages or operational disruptions.

RF Vulnerabilities

On this part, we analyze current examples of notable RF assaults which have been written about within the public press.

Replay Assault

Keyless entry programs have modified how individuals use automotive keys and entry safe areas, changing outdated bodily keys with key fobs. Nonetheless, these programs are weak to RF assaults. Automotive key fobs use RF alerts to ship a code to autos, permitting them to be unlocked and even began. From the late Eighties to early 2000s, keyless entry programs emerged as a premium on a number of vehicles. Like a storage door opener, a button can be pressed on the keyless entry machine, transmitting an RF sign to the automotive, and a code would enable the automotive to be locked or unlocked. With little-to-no safety included of their preliminary design, early keyless entry programs had been weak to cloning and replay assaults. Because the know-how grew to become extra plentiful, safety elevated, including fundamental encryption to keyless entry gadgets and options such because the rolling key methodology. Within the rolling key methodology, a brand new code is generated every time a button is pressed on the important thing fob. With the introduction of rolling keys, fundamental replay assaults not labored as a result of the captured and replayed code didn’t match the newly generated code.

In response to this stronger protection, two new forms of replay assaults emerged, the RollBack assault and the RollJam assault. RollBack captures two alerts: when a key’s pressed, the primary sign is jammed, and the second sign is allowed. The primary sign is then replayed, after which inside 5 seconds, the second sign is replayed to permit entry. Just like the RollBack assault, the RollJam assault captures two alerts. In contrast to RollBack, each alerts one and two are jammed, after which sign one is replayed rapidly, permitting the proprietor entry to the automotive. Then the second sign is replayed later by the attacker.

figure6_06162025

Determine 6: RollJam and RollBack Assaults on Keyless Car Methods

Car theft is a well-liked use of replay assaults. Nonetheless, residence automation programs will also be victims of these kinds of assaults. RF doorbell alerts may be cloned and replayed, as proven on this demonstration.

Relay Assault

Keyless entry programs are actually frequent options on most vehicles, and a brand new premium characteristic has emerged. With keyless automotive fobs, a sign from the important thing fob is all the time transmitting and the proprietor doesn’t must hit a button to unlock the automotive. Just like the replay assault, relay assaults use a tool to seize a radio sign. As an alternative of copying the sign, the machine boosts the sign to a second machine to make it seem to be a key fob is close to the automotive. This assault often requires two individuals. The primary thief stands near the automotive, whereas the second thief is close to the home making an attempt to pay attention for the always-transmitted sign from the important thing fob. As soon as the second thief can get the sign from the important thing fob, they replay that sign to the primary thief. As soon as the primary thief is within the automotive, the second thief will relay one other sign to the primary thief, who’s now capable of begin the automotive.

figure7_06162025

Determine 7: Instruments utilized in replay and relay assaults

Compounding the difficulty, all communication alerts that use radio frequency should register with the Federal Communication Fee (FCC). Key fobs have an FCC ID, which tells the frequency used. There are business instruments out there that enable an attacker to make use of the ID to set the frequency on their machine, simplifying the method since they don’t have to make use of different instruments to scan RF alerts and decide the frequency.

Affiliation Flood Assault

In an affiliation flood assault, an attacker exploits the method by which a brand new Zigbee node joins a community. In a Zigbee community, there’s a coordinator (grasp of the community), a router, and endpoints. The assault begins when a malicious actor replicates the becoming a member of procedures, the place a brand new node sends a beacon request to the coordinator of the community, adopted by an affiliation request. By flooding the coordinator with quite a few pretend requests, the attacker can overwhelm the community. This permits the malicious actor to realize unauthorized entry in a community of residence or workplace gadgets to delicate knowledge, management gadgets, or simply usually trigger disruptions to the Zigbee community.

figure8_06162025

Determine 8: Zigbee Mesh Community Topology

RF Vulnerabilities in Protection Purposes

RF know-how is closely utilized in protection purposes since superior radio know-how is used to hold out operations. Wi-fi communications have performed an integral function in tactical missions and normal warfare and protection operations. Safe alerts are used to guard voice and knowledge communications throughout operations. For instance, Single Channel Floor and Airborne Radio Methods (SINCGARS) are navy programs that present voice and knowledge to command-and-control operations. There are military-specific GPS alerts which might be designed to withstand jamming and assist management the operational atmosphere. Spectrum utilization within the navy area is an important a part of trendy navy operations that assist assist coordination and administration. Whether or not offering voice, knowledge, or cellular ad-hoc networking capabilities to warfighters, RF helps the monitoring of apparatus or autos or coordinating models with plane and drones. It’s a vital device for battle planning.

Spoofing and Jamming in GPS and Radar Methods

GPS alerts, essential for navigation and sustaining dependable positioning knowledge for operations, are an integral part of navy operations. Nonetheless, there was an increase of GPS assaults throughout the previous few years, as these programs may be spoofed or jammed by adversaries. Spoofing includes creating counterfeit alerts that may deceive receivers, comparable to giving an incorrect location. GPS and radar programs are prone to affiliation flood assaults, making your entire community imagine there are extra legitimate nodes then there actually are. The confusion created can be utilized to mislead drones or unmanned aerial autos (UAV) to a improper vacation spot.

GPS spoofing in navy operations is conceptually just like the automotive key fob assault described above. In a GPS spoofing assault, an adversary would possibly use ground-based programs to broadcast false GPS alerts that deceive navy GPS receivers, main them to navigate to incorrect coordinates. Simply as a automotive may be tricked into accepting a replayed key fob sign, navy programs counting on GPS may be misled by a replayed or pretend sign. Equally, an adversary may use an RF jamming machine to intrude with a radar system, stopping it from detecting incoming plane and deceptive radar operators into pondering an incoming plane is coming from a unique location.

In these instances, the vulnerability lies within the transmission of RF alerts with out correct safeguards towards interception, replay, or manipulation. Additional analysis into safeguarding and securing these programs towards dangers with extra anti-jamming methods, superior encryptions, or different pathways will assist guarantee nationwide safety.

Work with the SEI

Understanding RF vulnerabilities and dangers is step one in studying the way to mitigate them. Right here on the SEI, we’re creating instruments and processes to securely harness the facility of RF. For instance, we’re creating machine studying (ML) methods to foretell RF sign power and modulation sorts to assist speed up the aptitude of conventional physics-based modeling and simulation. This elevated velocity can allow purposes at present not possible, comparable to large-scale threat evaluation with uncertainty quantification, design optimization over very massive resolution areas, and extra lifelike real-time war-gaming.

Moreover, the SEI is working to modernize current processes, knowledge, and digital infrastructure by creating software program instruments and knowledge pipelines that assist RF spectrum operations because the disciplines of wi-fi communications and conventional cybersecurity operations proceed to maneuver in direction of convergence. In case you are keen on studying extra about this work or collaborating with the SEI, please contact us.

Will AI Exchange Software program Engineers? Detailed Overview


How typically have you ever caught your self pondering, “Wouldn’t it’s simpler at hand the mission over to AI as an alternative of paying a staff of builders?” It’s a tempting thought, particularly within the age of AI — however the actuality is much extra advanced.

On this article, we’ll discover what AI can really do in software program improvement, the place it nonetheless falls brief in comparison with people, and what conclusions firms ought to draw earlier than entrusting a mission to synthetic intelligence.

When AI Tried to Play Software program Engineer

Not too long ago, a shopper approached SCAND with a novel experiment in thoughts. They needed to check whether or not synthetic intelligence may independently develop a small internet utility and determined to make use of Cursor for the duty. The applying’s function was easy — fetch statistics from an exterior API and show them in a desk.

The preliminary end result appeared promising: AI created a functioning mission that included each client- and server-side elements, applied the fundamental logic for retrieving information, and even designed the interface. The desk appropriately displayed the statistics, and the general code construction appeared respectable at first look.

Nonetheless, upon nearer inspection, it turned clear that the answer was overengineered. As an alternative of instantly connecting to the API and displaying the information within the browser, AI constructed a full backend server that proxied requests, saved intermediate information, and required separate deployment.

For such a easy job, this was pointless — it difficult the infrastructure, added additional setup steps, and lengthened the combination course of.

Furthermore, AI didn’t account for error dealing with, request optimization, or integration with the shopper’s current programs. This meant builders needed to step in and redo components of the answer.

The Limits of Generative AI in Coding and Software program Improvement

Generative AI has already confirmed that it could possibly rapidly produce working code, however in apply, its capabilities in real-world software program improvement typically change into restricted. Listed below are the important thing points we recurrently encounter when reviewing AI‑generated initiatives:

AI-generated code

  • Lack of awareness of enterprise logic and structure. AI can’t see the complete image of a mission, its objectives, and its constraints. Consequently, the options it produces could also be technically appropriate however fully misaligned with the precise enterprise wants.
  • Incapacity to make architectural commerce‑offs. An skilled software program engineer evaluates the steadiness between improvement velocity, implementation value, and ease of upkeep. AI, however, can’t weigh these elements and tends to decide on a normal and even unnecessarily advanced strategy.
  • Overengineering. Producing pointless layers, modules, and providers is a typical mistake. For instance, a easy utility could find yourself with an additional backend that requires separate deployment and upkeep.
  • Ignoring the context of current programs. AI doesn’t take into consideration how new code will combine with the present infrastructure, which may result in incompatibilities or further prices for rework.
  • Code ≠ product. Synthetic intelligence can write fragments of code, however it doesn’t ship full options that take into consideration UX, safety, scalability, and long-term assist.
  • Doesn’t at all times absolutely perceive the duty. To get the specified end result, prompts typically should be clarified or rewritten in additional element — generally stretching to a full web page. This slows down the method and forces the developer to spend time refining the request as an alternative of transferring on to efficient implementation.

In the end, regardless of the rising position of AI in software program improvement, with out the involvement of skilled builders, such initiatives danger changing into a supply of technical debt and pointless prices.

Why Human Software program Builders Nonetheless Beat AI Brokers

Sure, generative AI and agentic AI can write code as we speak — generally even pretty good code. However there are nonetheless some issues that synthetic intelligence can’t exchange in knowledgeable software program developer’s workflow..

First, it’s understanding the enterprise context. A human doesn’t simply write a program — they know why and for whom it’s being created. AI sees a set of directions; a developer sees the actual job and understands the way it suits into the corporate’s objectives.

Second comes the power to make knowledgeable choices — whether or not to reuse current code or construct one thing from scratch. A human weighs deadlines, prices, and dangers. AI, in flip, typically follows a template with out taking hidden prices into consideration.

Third, it’s architectural flexibility. An skilled programmer can really feel when a mission is beginning to “develop” pointless layers and is aware of when it’s the suitable time to cease. AI, however, typically creates extreme buildings just because that’s what it has seen in its coaching examples.

Fourth comes desirous about the product’s future. Scalability, maintainability, and dealing with edge circumstances are constructed right into a developer’s mindset. AI will not be but able to anticipating such nuances.

And eventually, communication. A real software program engineer works with the shopper, clarifies necessities, and adjusts the strategy because the mission evolves. AI will not be able to actual dialogue or a delicate understanding of human priorities.

Due to this fact, in as we speak’s software program improvement panorama, synthetic intelligence continues to be a software — not a strategist. And within the foreseeable future, the human position in creating excessive‑high quality software program will stay important.

The desk under compares how people and AI deal with key points of improvement, and why the human position within the course of continues to be necessary.

Criterion Software program Developer Generative AI
Understanding enterprise context Analyzes mission objectives, target market, and long-term targets Sees solely the given immediate, with out understanding the larger image
Making architectural choices Balances velocity, value, simplicity, and maintainability Follows a template with out contemplating hidden prices
Structure optimization Avoids pointless modules and simplifies when doable Liable to overengineering, creating additional layers
Working with current programs Considers integration with present infrastructure Might generate incompatible options
Foresight Plans for scalability, error dealing with, and edge circumstances Typically ignores non‑normal eventualities
Collaboration Engages with the shopper, clarifies necessities, affords alternate options Understands the request in a restricted method, requires exact and detailed prompts
Flexibility in course of Adapts to altering necessities on the fly Requires code regeneration or a brand new immediate
Velocity of code technology Focuses on correctness and stability over uncooked velocity Generates code immediately, however it’s not at all times helpful or appropriate
Last deliverable Prepared‑to‑use product A set of code requiring evaluate and refinement

 Human Builders vs AI in Software program Improvement

The place AI Coding Instruments and Agentic AI Can Assist Software program Engineers

Regardless of its limitations, AI instruments have some strengths that make them precious assistants for software program engineers. In keeping with Statista (2024), 81% of builders worldwide reported elevated productiveness when utilizing AI, and greater than half famous improved work effectivity.

ai

Advantages of utilizing AI within the improvement workflow, Statista

In day‑to‑day improvement, AI can considerably velocity up routine duties and simplify supporting processes, akin to:

  • Producing boilerplate code. Generative AI can produce repetitive code buildings in seconds, saving time and permitting builders to give attention to enterprise logic.
  • Creating easy elements. AI can rapidly construct buttons, types, tables, and different UI components that may later be tailored to the mission’s wants.
  • Changing codecs. Synthetic intelligence can simply remodel information and code — from JSON to YAML or from TypeScript to JavaScript, and again.
  • Refactoring. AI can counsel code enhancements, simplify buildings, and take away duplicates.
  • Speedy prototyping. AI can construct a primary model of performance to check concepts or exhibit ideas to a shopper.

Nonetheless, even in these use circumstances, AI stays only a software. The ultimate model of the code ought to at all times undergo human evaluate and integration to make sure it meets architectural necessities, high quality requirements, and the mission’s enterprise context.

Ai

SCAND’s Method — AI + Human Experience within the Age of AI

At SCAND, we see synthetic intelligence not as a competitor to builders, however as a software that strengthens the staff. Our initiatives are constructed on a easy precept: AI accelerates — people information.

We use Copilot, ChatGPT, Cursor, and different AI instruments the place they really add worth — for rapidly creating templates, producing easy elements, and testing concepts. This enables us to save hours and days on routine duties.

However code technology is barely the start. Each AI‑produced answer goes by means of the arms of our skilled builders who:

  • Verify the correctness and safety of the code, together with potential license and copyright violations, since some items of the urged code could replicate fragments from open repositories.
  • Optimize the structure for the duty and mission specifics.
  • Adapt technical options to the enterprise logic and mission necessities.

We additionally pay particular consideration to information safety and confidentiality:

  • We don’t switch confidential information to public cloud-based AI with out safety, until the shopper particularly requests in any other case. In initiatives involving delicate or regulated data (for instance, medical or monetary information), we use native AI assistants — Ollama, LM Studio, llama.cpp, and others — deployed on the shopper’s safe servers.
  • We signal clear contracts that specify: who owns the ultimate code, whether or not AI instruments are allowed, and who’s chargeable for reviewing and fixing the code if it violates licenses or incorporates errors.
  • We embody obligations for documentation (AI utilization logs indicating when precisely and which instruments have been used) to trace the supply of potential points and guarantee transparency for audits.
  • We offer staff coaching on AI greatest practices, together with understanding the constraints of AI-generated content material, licensing dangers, and the significance of handbook validation.

Will AI Exchange Software program Engineers? The Sensible Actuality Verify

In the present day, synthetic intelligence in software program improvement is on the identical degree that calculators have been in accounting a number of many years in the past: a software that hurries up calculations, however doesn’t perceive why and what numbers should be calculated.

Generative AI can already do rather a lot — from producing elements to performing computerized refactoring. However constructing a software program product isn’t just about writing code. It’s about understanding the viewers, designing structure, assessing dangers, integrating with current programs, and planning lengthy‑time period assist for years forward. And that is the place the human issue stays irreplaceable.

As an alternative of the “AI replaces builders” situation, we’re transferring towards a blended‑staff mannequin, the place AI brokers turn into a part of the workflow and builders use them as accelerators and assistants. This synergy is already reshaping the software program improvement panorama and can proceed to outline it within the coming years.

The primary takeaway: the age of AI doesn’t eradicate the occupation of software program engineer — it transforms it, including new instruments and shifting priorities from routine coding towards structure, integration, and strategic design.

Regularly Requested Questions (FAQs)

Can AI write a whole app?

Sure, however typically with out optimization, with over‑engineered structure, and with out contemplating lengthy‑time period maintainability.

Will AI exchange frontend/backend builders?

Not but, since most improvement choices require enterprise context, commerce‑offs, and expertise that AI doesn’t possess.

What’s the largest influence of AI-generated code?

An elevated danger of technical debt, maintainability points, and architectural misalignment — all of which may finally drive up the price of rework.