Home Blog
Robots-Weblog | Für unter 50.000 Euro: igus stellt humanoiden Roboter Iggy Rob vor
Köln, 16. April 2025 – Humanoide Roboter stehen kurz davor, die Industrie kräftig umzukrempeln. Während bisherige Systeme sehr teuer sind, bietet der movement plastics Spezialist igus mit dem Iggy Rob nun seinen ersten humanoiden Roboter als Low-Price-Lösung an. Für 47.999 Euro unterstützt er in der industriellen Fertigung, bei Transportaufgaben oder im Service. Um Erfahrung mit dem neuen Helfer zu sammeln, ruft igus zum „Check earlier than Make investments“ auf.
Der Development zeigt in eine klare Richtung: Schätzungen zufolge könnten bis 2030 20 Millionen humanoide Roboter in der Industrie im Einsatz sein. Die Nachfrage nach der Technologie steigt auch bei europäischen Unternehmen rasant an, das Downside dabei: Humanoide Roboter sind aktuell noch sehr teuer, erste Anwendungsmöglichkeiten müssen vielerorts erst identifiziert werden. Das möchte der Kölner movement plastics Experte igus nun ändern: Mit dem Iggy Rob liefert das Unternehmen einen preisgünstigen humanoiden Roboter, der dank seiner zwei Arme und einem stabilen, rädergetriebenen Unterbau eine Vielzahl von Anwendungen ermöglicht. „Die Welt ist für den Menschen geschaffen, das Potenzial für humanoide Roboter ist deshalb riesig“, erklärt Alexander Mühlens, Leiter Geschäftsbereich Low-Price-Automation bei igus.
Acht Stunden ohne Pause im Einsatz
Der Iggy Rob ist rund 1,70 Meter groß und kann sich acht Stunden lang mit nur einer Akkuladung bewegen. Ausgestattet mit einem Lächeln begrüßt er seine Kolleginnen und Kollegen mit zwei ReBeL Cobot Armen und zwei bionischen Händen. Ausgestattet mit einem LIDAR-Sensor und 3D-Kameras zur Objektdetektion navigiert der Roboter problemlos durch sein Umfeld. Zur Steuerung nutzt igus die hauseigene igus Robotic Management. Der Roboter ist nach VDE 5050 für das Flottenmanagement zugelassen und besitzt eine CE-Zertifizierung. Ergänzt um eine ROS2-Schnittstelle erfüllt Iggy Rob die Ansprüche an moderne Robotik.
AMR schafft die Grundlagen
Die Foundation von Iggy Rob bildet der Autonome Cellular Roboter (AMR) ReBeL Transfer. Die cellular Plattform ist dank einer Dreipunktlagerung sehr stabil. igus hat bei seinem humanoiden Roboter bewusst auf Beine verzichtet, da die Infrastruktur für AMRs in vielen Fabriken bereits fortgeschritten ist. Mit einer Traglast von 50 Kilogramm und 100 Kilogramm Zuladung schafft der ReBeL Transfer die Voraussetzungen für die arbeitsplatzungebundene Bewegung. Der Iggy Rob kann als Serviceroboter am Empfang arbeiten, Transportaufgaben in der Fabrik übernehmen oder in der Kantine Besteck abräumen. igus selbst plant, den Iggy Rob beim Einlegen von Bauteilen in die Spritzgussmaschinen des Unternehmens zu nutzen. „Wir gehen davon aus, dass humanoide Roboter zu Beginn vor allem für industrielle Zwecke interessant sind“, erklärt Alexander Mühlens.
Gemeinsame Fortentwicklung: „Check earlier than Make investments“
In der Weiterentwicklung des Iggy Robs zählt igus auf seine Kunden. Der Hersteller bietet bereits vor dem Kauf ein „Check earlier than Make investments“-Programm an, bei dem die igus Experten die Potenziale vor Ort evaluieren und Einsatzmöglichkeiten am realen Roboter prüfen. Ist der Check überzeugend, so ist der Iggy Rob zu einem im Marktvergleich niedrigen Kaufpreis von 47.999 Euro erhältlich. „Bisher erhältliche humanoide Roboter kosten teils zwei- oder dreimal so viel“, sagt Mühlens.
Mehr Informationen zum humanoiden Roboter finden Sie unter: https://www.igus.de/automation/information/humanoider-roboter
Progress, not perfection: What we are able to study from Microsoft and HSBC’s local weather goal pullbacks
Key takeaways
- Two main firms, Microsoft and HSBC, lately deemed their local weather targets out of attain — however had very totally different responses.
- Microsoft refined its stance and determined to press ahead by focusing extra immediately on carbon discount and clear power. HSBC, then again, postponed its direct operations local weather targets, highlighting the intricate realities of decarbonization.
- These responses present that sustainability professionals should shift the dialog from penalizing firms for not assembly idealized requirements to celebrating tangible, accountable motion that strikes us nearer to a sustainable future.
As the worldwide local weather disaster intensifies, the company path to decarbonization has by no means been extra advanced. It’s fraught with technological hurdles, regulatory uncertainties and altering political tides. It’s additionally largely depending on voluntary local weather motion – which is more and more troublesome amid company monetary realities and market situations.
These realities usually are not with out consequence. Many company local weather targets are shifting, even inside companies which have beforehand dedicated to decarbonization. In truth, two main gamers, Microsoft and HSBC, lately deemed their local weather targets out of attain.
Though these two firms are responding very in another way, each instances spotlight the real-world pressures on voluntary local weather motion — and underscore an pressing have to concentrate on progress, not perfection, to incentivize company local weather motion.
Contrasting responses
In February, Microsoft introduced it was recalibrating its local weather investments after acknowledging it could miss key interim milestones on its path to turning into carbon destructive by 2030. In truth, the tech conglomerate stated its emissions had elevated in 2023 and its choice to cease shopping for renewable power consumption certificates might power the corporate to cease calling itself “carbon impartial”. As an alternative, it plans to focus extra immediately on carbon discount and clear power by way of direct emissions cuts and high-quality removals, regardless of its earlier assertions that its targets are a “moonshot.”
Though refining its stance, Microsoft remains to be urgent ahead. Its current pivot in local weather technique shouldn’t be merely about adjusting investments — it’s additionally a candid recognition of immediately’s actuality and the way onerous it’s to attempt for formidable climate-change targets.
This adaptive strategy underscores an vital fact: whereas the goalposts might have shifted, steady, versatile dedication is way extra impactful than clinging to outdated benchmarks. That is laudable, but it surely’s unclear if taking an adaptive strategy will develop into the company norm or be left because the exception.
Lower than per week after Microsoft’s announcement, HSBC opted to delay its local weather targets associated to its personal operations, citing uncertainties across the Science Primarily based Targets initiative’s (SBTi) steerage on carbon credit and the complexities of decreasing Scope 3 emissions. The world’s seventh-largest financial institution now goals to succeed in a state of web zero direct operational emissions by 2050 – not by 2030 because it had initially deliberate. Importantly, this choice applies solely to HSBC’s operational emissions — its targets for the a lot bigger financed portfolio (which is the place the vast majority of HSBC’s emissions sit) stay unchanged.
HSBC’s choice to postpone its direct operations local weather targets highlights the numerous challenges many firms face immediately. Confronted with the intricate realities of decarbonization and the unpredictable steerage round the usage of carbon credit, HSBC’s cautious delay is an unlucky, if comprehensible, response.
Relatively than deciphering HSBC’s transfer as an indication of reluctance, take into account it a mirrored image of the real difficulties encountered when translating formidable local weather objectives into sensible, actionable plans. Uncertainty round whether or not carbon credit can credibly be used as a short-term bridge to longer-term reductions, an absence of clear steerage from commonplace setters, challenges in measuring and decreasing Scope 3 emissions, and the operational complexity of reducing emissions throughout massive, international provide chains are all large hurdles to face. On this context, HSBC’s strategy is a predictable response to present market situations.
Incentivizing motion over perfection
Whereas each Microsoft and HSBC stepped again from facets of their local weather plans, their responses took totally different varieties. Microsoft communicated its challenges overtly and renewed its concentrate on tangible motion. HSBC delayed its targets for direct operations in response to evolving steerage and market uncertainty, whereas sustaining its financed emissions objectives. The query now’s whether or not extra firms will take Microsoft’s path — acknowledging difficulties whereas reinforcing ambition — or go for a extra cautious, phased strategy reminiscent of HSBC’s.
These contrasting examples reveal a crucial fact: insisting on absolute perfection earlier than motion is taken – and lambasting firms for his or her claims – can do extra hurt than good. In some instances, firms taking early steps, reminiscent of experimenting with credit or interim objectives, are publicly criticized, main others to delay motion for worry of reputational danger. We should shift the dialog from penalizing firms for not assembly idealized requirements to celebrating tangible, accountable motion that strikes us nearer to a sustainable future.
A name to plain setters and steerage suppliers
Normal setters and steerage suppliers, such because the SBTi, the Greenhouse Gasoline Protocol, and the Worldwide Group for Standardization (ISO), have a pivotal function to play in shifting the dialog. As an alternative of imposing stricter benchmarks which will inadvertently decelerate local weather progress, they’ll develop versatile, tiered requirements that acknowledge and reward incremental enhancements. Acceptable claims language, reputational advantages, and collaborative partnerships can all be leveraged to create an atmosphere the place firms really feel supported in taking decisive motion now somewhat than suspending progress till a later date.
The paths chosen by Microsoft and HSBC remind us that company local weather motion shouldn’t be a one-size-fits-all proposition. Whereas some firms will proceed to push ahead aggressively, others will select to navigate inside and exterior headwinds with a extra measured tempo. As an alternative of bashing imperfection, we have to encourage firms to take environmental motion — even when that motion isn’t flawless.
Utilizing Devices to profile a SwiftUI app – Donny Wals
A key talent for each app developer is with the ability to profile your app’s efficiency. Your app would possibly look nice on the floor, but when it doesn’t carry out properly, it’s going to really feel off—typically subtly, typically very noticeably. Lovely animations, slick interactions, and huge knowledge units all fall flat if the app feels sluggish or unresponsive.
Nice apps reply immediately. They present that you just’ve tapped one thing straight away, and so they make interactions really feel easy and satisfying.
To verify your app behaves like that, you’ll must control its efficiency. On this publish, we’ll take a look at how you should use Devices to profile your SwiftUI app. We’ll cowl find out how to detect sluggish code, monitor view redraws, and perceive when and why your UI updates. For those who’re focused on a deeper dive into SwiftUI redraws or profiling sluggish code, try these posts:
We’ll begin by constructing your app for profiling, then take a look at find out how to use Devices successfully—each for SwiftUI specifics and basic efficiency monitoring.
Constructing an app for profiling
Step one is to construct your app utilizing Product > Profile, or by urgent Cmd + I (sidenote: I extremely suggest studying shortcuts for command you employ ceaselessly).
This builds your app in Launch mode, utilizing the identical optimizations and configurations as your manufacturing construct.
That is essential as a result of your improvement construct (Debug mode) isn’t optimized. You would possibly see efficiency points in Debug that don’t exist in Launch. I not too long ago had this occur whereas working with giant knowledge units—code ran fairly horrible in Debug was optimized in Launch to the purpose of now not being an issue in any respect.
When this occurs, it often means there’s some inefficiency underneath the hood, however I wouldn’t spend an excessive amount of time on points that disappear in Launch mode when you’ve got larger points to work on.
As soon as your app is constructed and Devices launches, you’ll see a bunch of templates. For SwiftUI apps, the SwiftUI template is often the best selection—even in case you’re not profiling SwiftUI-specific points. It consists of the whole lot you want for a typical SwiftUI app.
After selecting your template, Devices opens its essential window. Hit the pink document button to begin profiling. Your app will launch, and Devices will begin amassing knowledge in real-time based mostly on the devices you chose. The SwiftUI template collects the whole lot in real-time.
Studying the collected knowledge
Devices organizes its knowledge into a number of lanes. You’ll see lanes like View Physique, View Properties, and Core Animation Commits. Let’s undergo them from high to backside.
Observe that I’m testing on a bodily gadget. Testing on the simulator can work okay for some use instances however outcomes can differ wildly between simulators and gadgets because of the sources accessible to every. It’s all the time beneficial to make use of a tool when testing for efficiency.
The View Physique lane
This lane reveals how usually a SwiftUI view’s physique is evaluated. Each time SwiftUI detects a change in your app’s knowledge, it re-evaluates the physique of any views that depend upon that knowledge. It then determines whether or not any youngster views must be redrawn.
So, this lane primarily reveals you which of them views are being redrawn and the way usually. For those who click on the timing abstract, you’ll see how lengthy these evaluations take—whole, min, max, and common durations. This helps you establish whether or not a view’s physique is fast or costly to guage.
By default, Devices reveals knowledge for the whole profiling session. Which means a view that was evaluated a number of occasions could have been triggered by totally different interactions over time.
Often, you’ll wish to profile a selected interplay. You are able to do this by dragging throughout a timeframe within the lane. This allows you to zoom in on a selected window of exercise—like what occurs whenever you faucet a button.
When you’ve zoomed in, you can begin to kind a psychological mannequin.
For instance, if tapping a button will increase a counter, you’d count on the counter view’s physique to be evaluated. If different views just like the button’s dad or mum additionally redraw, that is perhaps sudden. Ask your self: did I count on this physique to be re-evaluated? If not, it’s time to look into your code.
In my publish on SwiftUI view redraws, I clarify extra about what may cause SwiftUI to re-evaluate views. It’s price a learn if you wish to dig deeper.
View Properties and Core Animation Commits
The View Properties and Core Animation Commits lanes are ones I don’t use fairly often.
In View Properties, you may see which items of state SwiftUI tracked in your views and what their values have been. In principle, you may work out how your knowledge mannequin modified between physique evaluations—however in observe, it’s not all the time straightforward to learn.
Core Animation Commits reveals how a lot work Core Animation or the GPU needed to do when redrawing views. Often, it’s not too heavy, but when your view physique takes a very long time to guage, the commit tends to be heavier too.
I don’t take a look at this lane in isolation, however it helps to get a way of how costly redrawing grew to become after a physique analysis.
Studying the Time Profiler
The Time Profiler is perhaps probably the most helpful lane within the SwiftUI Devices template. It reveals you which of them code was working on which thread, and the way lengthy it was working.
You’re primarily seeing snapshots of the CPU at quick intervals. This provides you perception into how lengthy particular features have been energetic.
When profiling SwiftUI apps, you’ll often be focused on code associated to your knowledge mannequin or views. If a operate updates your knowledge and seems sluggish, or if it’s referred to as from a view physique, which may clarify a efficiency problem.
Getting comfy with the time profiler takes a little bit of observe. I like to recommend enjoying round with the decision tree settings. I often:
- Separate by thread
- Invert the decision tree
- Disguise system libraries
Typically, I tweak these settings relying on what I’m looking for. It’s price exploring.
In abstract
Profiling your code and understanding find out how to use Devices is important if you wish to construct responsive, high-quality apps. As your app grows, it will get more durable to mentally monitor what ought to occur throughout an interplay.
The difficult half about utilizing Devices is that even with a ton of knowledge, you have to perceive what your app is meant to be doing. With out that, it’s laborious to inform which components of the information matter. One thing is perhaps sluggish—however that is perhaps okay if it’s processing a whole lot of knowledge.
Nonetheless, entering into the behavior of profiling your app usually helps you construct a way of what’s regular and what’s not. The sooner and extra usually you do that, the higher your understanding turns into.
The Auto Manufacturers Electrifying Quickest in USA — Gross sales Charts (EXCLUSIVE)
Join CleanTechnica’s Weekly Substack for Zach and Scott’s in-depth analyses and excessive stage summaries, join our day by day e-newsletter, and/or comply with us on Google Information!
Final Up to date on: sixteenth April 2025, 03:11 am
As they are saying, every little thing’s relative. Nicely, not every little thing — if it was, the phrase “relative” wouldn’t exist. However generally we wish to or want to know issues in absolute phrases, and different instances we wish to or want to know issues in relative phrases. I’ve to say that I’m a complete sucker for crunching information to see who cleantech leaders are in relative phrases.
Earlier at the moment, I reported on the auto manufacturers promoting essentially the most electrical autos in america to this point this yr. And that follows a take a look at the high promoting EV fashions within the nation and charts on the long-term progress of the EV market within the USA. Now, let’s check out one thing you gained’t discover anyplace else — the share of gross sales from the market’s auto manufacturers and auto teams that at the moment are EV gross sales. (And, sure, we’re simply taking a look at pure EV gross sales right here, not together with plugin hybrids.)
Within the first chart, taking a look at auto manufacturers, I’m together with pure electrical firms. Nevertheless, within the chart for auto teams and alliances, I’m excluding them since that makes the chart more durable to look at.
Together with the pure EV manufacturers is admittedly simply to provide them a nod. Let’s hope all of them survive. The spotlight legacy model, although, is Fiat. If you happen to go to its web site, Fiat is barely promoting electrical autos now. Nevertheless, there are nonetheless some legacy gas-powered Fiats hanging round on heaps, so Fiat’s apparently not at 100% EV gross sales but — but it surely ought to get there quickly! In fact, Fiat has the bottom quantity of gross sales amongst all auto manufacturers within the nation, so it’s a footnote, however kudos to Fiat nonetheless. (Fiat moved solely 522 autos within the 1st quarter, and whereas that was a 239% improve in gross sales yr over yr, it was barely greater than 1 / 4 of Alfa Romeo’s gross sales!)
What’s actually thrilling is how excessive the EV share of Porsche and Cadillac gross sales has turn out to be. Porsche, with top-quality racing genes, is in first amongst notable auto manufacturers, with 23% of its gross sales being electrical within the 1st quarter, however Cadillac isn’t far behind at 19% share. Humorous sufficient, I used to be simply commenting to myself at the moment that I’m now always seeing Cadillac LYRIQs in all places I’m going and so they appear to account for many of the Cadillacs I see on the highway. I’ve additionally seen a couple of Cadillac Escalade IQs — Cadillac’s top-of-the-line providing now. EVs have clearly turn out to be essentially the most premium and desired autos available on the market.
Different premium manufacturers account for the following three positions on the chart — Acura (15.6% EV share regardless of being very new to the EV world), BMW (15.5% EV share), and Audi (13.8% EV share). Then we get Volkswagen, which has tried to be daring in its EV transition plans and now has nearly 11% of its US gross sales coming from EVs. (I do know, I’d a lot reasonably see it at 44% by now, however it’s the main mid-market auto model and deserves some props for that.) MINI is the final model to be in double digits, and that was simply barely at 10.0% of its gross sales coming from EVs.
Not way more is notable on there if we don’t wish to spotlight the laggards, however the greatest shocker of the entire chart for me was seeing Dodge at 9% EV gross sales. Dodge! Nicely, I assume Dodge consumers are very into efficiency, and everybody ought to know by now that there’s no competing with the moment torque of electrical motors. I assume sufficient Dodge drivers obtained smoked by Teslas and different EVs that they determined to purchase the primary electrical Dodge available on the market. Hopefully that may encourage Dodge to supply and promote extra EVs ASAP.
auto teams and alliances, EV share of gross sales will get watered down a bit. The manufacturers that shine get diluted by the manufacturers that don’t. Some individuals favor this rating, although, as a result of it exhibits extra totally how a lot a company is behind the transition to EVs.
On this rating, we see BMW Group — lengthy a pioneer in EVs attempting to be a pacesetter of the revolution — reaching 15% EV gross sales. Volkswagen Group is available in honorably within the silver medal place.
Clearly, the Germans are far forward of the pack, as third place Hyundai–Kia had simply 5.5% of gross sales coming from EVs. By nearly all accounts, that’s not a share to be pleased with. Comparatively talking, although, it did beat each different mass-market legacy auto group/alliance.
Do any others deserve point out? Nicely, a minimum of GM, Mercedes-Benz Group, Ford Motor Firm, and Honda Motor Firm are above 4%, but it surely’s arduous to cheer them on at such low EV shares. Simply don’t look additional down the record.
Let me know down within the feedback — do the automakers that rank within the high three to 5 locations in these rankings deserve reward for being leaders in a weak market, or ought to all of them be shamed for not attaining increased percentages by now? I’m torn between the 2 factors of view.
Whether or not you’ve gotten solar energy or not, please full our newest solar energy survey.
Have a tip for CleanTechnica? Wish to promote? Wish to recommend a visitor for our CleanTech Discuss podcast? Contact us right here.
Join our day by day e-newsletter for 15 new cleantech tales a day. Or join our weekly one if day by day is just too frequent.
CleanTechnica makes use of affiliate hyperlinks. See our coverage right here.
CleanTechnica’s Remark Coverage